Search results

You didn't show any such thing. You don't get to wave things away just because you've convinced yourself doofus. He dropped himself in it and he was hardly being "grilled". Have you even seen the interview? More than enough to raise a fair few eyebrows and question marks, which is what...

Well, let's see. Apart from the allegations themselves there was Moore's interview with Hannity, about as convincing as a party election broadcast - so much so that even Hannity publicly called on Moore to address the allegations. Then there was his reputation at the local mall, Moore's own...

You mean the very same and boringly predictable deflection 'go to's' when you're bereft of an argument on point? The same as you've utilized for the last six plus years? You're being asked specifics in regards to senator Roy Moore and his reticence to take a lie detector test when it might...

I'm neither an atheist or homosexual. I'm only an 'activist' in your deluded little world whereby not agreeing that homosexuals should be persecuted is tantamount to being one. Same ole' with you aCW. Projection at its lowest. Not a jot as to why someone accused of sexual assault would wait so...

http://edition.cnn.com/videos/politics/2017/12/28/roy-moore-spokeswoman-polygraph-test.cnn So, even Janet Porter agrees that Moore should have taken such a polygraph test waaay before he did if these allegations were all just made up, so why didn't he? What kind of campaign team did this guy...

Oh, hey, if anyone's found guilty of making up false allegations against Moore, then I fully support them being prosecuted to the full extent of the law. You, on the other hand simply want to dismiss such allegations as non existent despite there being more than a '?' over Moore in regards to...

Well, yes he did, by more than 21,000 votes in the end and his feeble petition on the grounds of 'voter fraud' was summarily thrown out in short order. I know it's a bit of a blow to you as you didn't seem to realize this whereas people who keep up to date with current events already knew but...

You don't keep up to date do you? It's official, your guy lost. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-42506727 Nope, that didn't answer the question. Why didn't Moore get a polygraph test before the night of the election? If he was contesting the results based on voter fraud and not the...

Yeah, his "case" was thrown out in case you're not up to speed and why would he wait until after the election to take a polygraph while arguing that he lost due to voter fraud anyway?

Aw, you're welcome doofus, happy Christmas! :cheers:

You're not gonna top these gems aCW. I'd close your blog now while it's hit its peak! :D

Strap yourselves in oh dedicated hordes of aCW followers, this latest installment is gonna be one helluva ride by the looks of it. One of you may even feel inclined to post in it! :roses:

Eh? Part five's here already???!!!! WEEHEY!! :cloud9: Please say this means it's more of the same recycled, repetitive, pompous, bloated, egotistical windbaggery we all come to expect from such a 'treasured stalwart'? If you don't write 732 'written lisps', allude to other posters being gay...

Fundamentalist nuttiness that would plunge the world into WWIII? Discuss...

As I was 'removed from the discussion' over in the "5 pillars of Mohammedanism" thread then this is a reply to 'Dodge' from that very convo: http://theologyonline.com/showthread.php?124932-Dad-goes-off-on-school-board-for-teaching-the-5-pillars-of-Mohammedanism&p=5015879&viewfull=1#post5015879...

Seeing as you've locked your thread then allow me to answer here and without all the troll like crap: "Ah, now old evasive AB kicks in. So the bottom line is, your question was never genuine but was just a trap you thought you'd lay for me. That about it?" No. :e4e:

When they advocate things that would effectively silence any dissenting voice to the point of them being executed for indulging in practices or beliefs that wouldn't align with their perceived 'status quo'? The Following archive thread being a case in point...

Well, according to venerated and scholarly accredited historian Pastor Scott Lively, he may very well be... :shocked: GWc8FFm8tOI aCW, take note... :eek:

He wasn't working and he begged for food. Why was the rich man wrong in denying him even the scraps of food off his table? Plenty here seem to think that those who don't work shouldn't eat so does this apply to all the homeless 'bums' and those down on their luck as well?

Brought to you by the same services that proved Buck Rogers actually did come from the 25th century and Gil Gerard was a packet of cornflakes. In other news the incredible hulk is a Tibetan manuscript and Roger Moore actually is James Bond!! :shocked: