Search results

It's not ironic at all. You can follow "We Are Paul Revere" all you want and similar. I'm not going to buy into any such bunk and I'll continue to wear a mask and other safety protocols without whining on about my civil liberties being infringed upon.

Hardly. I wear a mask primarily for the protection of others so your 'living in a bomb shelter' comment was ignorant to start with. You're free to believe and buy into anything as you will. I'll continue to be responsible.

Hmm, aren't you the guy who advocates "We Are Paul Revere"? Yes, I wear a mask and it certainly isn't for personal comfort. If it helps in even a small way to reduce the possibility of infection to other people then hey, if that bothers you then frankly, so what?

I'm not saying that all people who propose such believe in exactly the same thing but it is a common theme among many who push for such. Why don't you outline what you believe it should entail and take it from there?

If it's "irrational" to prefer to have laws whereby people should be able to choose whether to get married or not, then hey, "guilty as charged". It isn't but you keep telling yourself that if you want. I'm well aware of the correlation between drug/alcohol abuse and poverty but marriage doesn't...

Oddly enough no. I don't wear a tin foil hat either.

That's not answering my question and of course there should be freedom of religion in society. That wasn't the point.

I am not a conspiracy loon and I'll continue to wear the things for reasons outlined beforehand.

I don't like to see any such thing and you really are pathetic. I support people having the right to get married or not, that's all. That's the kind of freedom we're allowed in the West and if you're one of those who would overturn laws that would curb freedom then don't pretend that you're...

Well, you'll have plenty more time to be bored then because the evidence available is undeniable. It was "Trumpster's" that stormed Capitol Hill and if you want to deny it and claim they were part of Antifa or whatnot then go ahead. Almost laughable if it wasn't so tragic. Once again, kudos to...

Indeed, he might well receive some form of commendation and rightly so. It certainly wasn't a waste of time. The likelihood of Trump being convicted was remote from the outset but the damning evidence has been displayed for the world to see and it's embarrassing to say the least. It's...

Well, they are and your stubborn refusal to admit such isn't going to alter anything either. What your latter is supposed to represent is anyone's guess. If you happen to support a form of government that makes sexual relations out of wedlock a crime then you're only underlining the point that I...

Well, no, again, you didn't see it because I didn't say it but hey, you continue to accumulate graphs and buy into any narrative that fits your bias. I'll continue to wear them for aforementioned reasons.

If it hadn't been for officer Goodman it may have been more "successful"...

He was on 'Newsmax', one of the most pro Trump outlets out there and the anchor walked off. Lindell was ranting like a lunatic. It was hilarious in some senses but I still support his right to give his crazy little views, heck, even at full volume if that helps any.

How so? I've blatantly expressed that people like Lindell and all manner of others that I happen to disagree with should have a platform to air their views, no matter how crazy I may happen to find them. You can accuse me of such but it ain't true.

And yet another irony meter has to pass away...

You had that during the time. You keep kidding yourself otherwise if you want though. It's beyond boring now...

No, it doesn't. It just amounts to his shouting being reduced to a lower decibel level. I still support his right to air his views.

Um, no, I don't want him censored but if he's gonna shout like a loon then I sure don't mind the volume being turned down...