Search results

Why are you bothering to 'respond' if you can't answer a straightforward question? Ya know what, don't bother. Anyone who makes excuses for people forcing themselves onto others against their will be it in marriage or else has something deeply wrong with them anyway.

Eh? I've just given you the floor to prove your own claims. What "fear" would I have exactly in relation to what you've gone on about? I've seen credible news on a daily basis that shows outright and on the ground that war crimes have been perpetuated by Russian forces, it's undeniable. You are...

So you haven't got an answer then?

One such "folly" would be a husband raping his wife and expecting anything righteous to come of it. Perhaps you can explain how there's anything loving or cherishing about doing that? If a man forces himself on his girlfriend then is that rape to you or is that also "something else"? No need to...

Yes, 100%.

It means that the likelihood of one couple being able to keep the human race afloat is unlikely at best.

I keep repeating it because it is true. That the vast majority of folk recognize this is only to be expected. Those with a functioning moral compass don't even need it explaining. Sure, there's an insidious minority who can't seem to recognize the obvious or concoct their own twisted "reasoning"...

Well, he is professor of confirmation bias...

Well, gotta disagree there. I'd like to see the current Russian regime obliterated and Putin and like stand trial for war crimes and rot, but not Russia itself.

You're a loony conspiracy theorist alright, that's a given. Tell ya what, you prove that the likes of what happened in Bucha wasn't perpetrated by Russian forces with irrefutable proof and I'll leave the forum. So crack on with it.

Makes you wonder what some folk interpret "love" and "cherish" to actually mean. Must have a different dictionary to what most of us have...

To be fair by now you shouldn't be that shocked exactly... Some of these views have been about for years on this board. It's repugnant as all get out but that's patriarchal fundamentalism in all its "glory" unfortunately. Apparently it's not possible for a husband to rape his wife... It is of...

Hmm, specify in the marriage vows where consent is given from either party to demand sex whenever they want regardless of their partners willingness to engage in it.

Well, if there were only one couple left then that would kinda be the end of the human race anyway realistically.

Well, no. The government should prosecute a man who rapes his wife. Big difference...

Your wife, partner, whoever. Rape is one of the most atrocious violations of another person there is. Can't believe this has to be even said, repeatedly.

Well, duh, of course she'd be your wife just as much as you would be her husband. Where exactly are you getting this notion that a man is designed to be more sexually active than a woman from? If a wife has no desire for sex then a loving husband would respect that. If she continually has no...

From your post #111 "Depends. How long has she avoided me, and why. I will say having sex with a lump of motionless flesh wouldn't be very satisfying. But that goes back to the dual nature of sex... and marriage. She belongs to me, and I belong to her." Charming that innit? She does not...

Here's you: An apologist for Putin. The projection was almost funny though, I'll give ya that.

I've seen footage on the ground by veteran war correspondents out there in the thick of it and on a daily basis. Unlike you, I don't source my "news" from any given wingnut site thanks.