Search results

Maybe an analogy will help. Think of light as a pool of water. God created the pool of light, and it originally didn't "flow," it had no directionality, and so there were no shadows. "Light" had not been "separated" from the "darkness," yet. Then God made it so that it only flows in one...

It just means that light was everywhere, and there was no shadow.

Says the one who tries to jam literally billions of years into a place where no room is available to even try. Says the one who rejects what the Bible says in favor of his own beliefs. Try starting with the Bible, rather than with secular ideas. Quit posturing. But you still believe in...

It's closer to 7500 years, give or take 100 years. And I can prove it too.

B57: I'm just going to ignore everything that was just said and continue pushing my beliefs.

All creatures (as specified by the Bible) that were alive at the time of the flood died because of the flood, aside from those that were saved on the Ark. All creatures that were NOT on the Ark, that died before the flood, died after Adam's creation. Remember, Earth was still a lush paradise...

You're missing the "of." OF Not "All." No, it's not the logical conclusion. As RD said: Something you seem to have missed, given your response to him. Why do you assume there weren't any? Is it because of your a priori beliefs that they existed millions of years ago, rather than only a...

No, you didn't. This does not answer the challenge. Again, the challenge is: Why does most of the life that has ever existed have to have existed before Adam was created if 1% exists/ed after Noah? Why are you ignoring the roughly 2000 years between Adam and Noah? Why couldn't the 99% have...

You're dodging. Don't avoid the direct challenge to your assertion. Why does most of the life that has ever existed have to have existed before Adam was created if 1% exists/ed after Noah? Why are you ignoring the roughly 2000 years between Adam and Noah?

You're dodging. Don't avoid the direct challenge to your assertion. Why does most of the life that has ever existed have to have existed before Adam was created if 1% exists/ed after Noah? Why are you ignoring the roughly 2000 years between Adam and Noah?

Yup. Still ignoring anything anyone else says that goes against his position.

That doesn't answer the question. Again, Why does most of the life that has ever existed have to have existed before Adam was created? False. There was about 2000 years between Adam's creation and the Flood. Noah wasn't Adam's son. He was his...

As RD said, this is elephant hurling. Not our problem. Even if this were true, so what? Nope. As RD pointed out, Noah did exactly as God told him to. You, for believing that someone is at fault for animals going extinct. No one has said that you "shake them up." Here is what happened...

Saying it doesn't make it so. And yes, it does explain it, rather well. It's called "tidal pumping." Would a video explanation interest you?

The Hydroplate Theory is more than just a theory for where the water comes from. It also explains the mile deep layers of sediments across the globe, and comets, asteroids, meteors/ites, as well as where Earth's radioactivity comes from. It also explains why there are rainbows in the clouds...

Hydroplate Theory. https://rsr.org/hpt http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/

EXACTLY! CORRECT! Yup. "Seemingly forever" not "actually forever." Without having read it, I think part of the problem (not that it's necessarily a bad thing) is that we use "hell" and "lake of fire" as if they're the same thing sometimes, especially in the context of the rest of eternity...

WHY? If the answer had teeth it would have bitten you and would have been clinging onto you as if it's life depended on it. If it had eyes, it would have been staring you in the face this entire time. And God saw the light, that it was good; and God divided the light from the darkness. -...

Relevant: https://theweeklyworldview.com/surviving-the-death-cult/

Why do you both assume that "neandertals" were anything other than humans? Comparing them to "beasts" is inhumane. They were HUMANS. Ancient humans, sure, but humans nonetheless. Not a cross between human and beast. Not beasts. HUMANS! https://kgov.com/neandertal