Search results

You're missing the "of." OF Not "All." No, it's not the logical conclusion. As RD said: Something you seem to have missed, given your response to him. Why do you assume there weren't any? Is it because of your a priori beliefs that they existed millions of years ago, rather than only a...

No, you didn't. This does not answer the challenge. Again, the challenge is: Why does most of the life that has ever existed have to have existed before Adam was created if 1% exists/ed after Noah? Why are you ignoring the roughly 2000 years between Adam and Noah? Why couldn't the 99% have...

You're dodging. Don't avoid the direct challenge to your assertion. Why does most of the life that has ever existed have to have existed before Adam was created if 1% exists/ed after Noah? Why are you ignoring the roughly 2000 years between Adam and Noah?

You're dodging. Don't avoid the direct challenge to your assertion. Why does most of the life that has ever existed have to have existed before Adam was created if 1% exists/ed after Noah? Why are you ignoring the roughly 2000 years between Adam and Noah?

Yup. Still ignoring anything anyone else says that goes against his position.

That doesn't answer the question. Again, Why does most of the life that has ever existed have to have existed before Adam was created? False. There was about 2000 years between Adam's creation and the Flood. Noah wasn't Adam's son. He was his...

As RD said, this is elephant hurling. Not our problem. Even if this were true, so what? Nope. As RD pointed out, Noah did exactly as God told him to. You, for believing that someone is at fault for animals going extinct. No one has said that you "shake them up." Here is what happened...

Saying it doesn't make it so. And yes, it does explain it, rather well. It's called "tidal pumping." Would a video explanation interest you?

The Hydroplate Theory is more than just a theory for where the water comes from. It also explains the mile deep layers of sediments across the globe, and comets, asteroids, meteors/ites, as well as where Earth's radioactivity comes from. It also explains why there are rainbows in the clouds...

Hydroplate Theory. https://rsr.org/hpt http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/

EXACTLY! CORRECT! Yup. "Seemingly forever" not "actually forever." Without having read it, I think part of the problem (not that it's necessarily a bad thing) is that we use "hell" and "lake of fire" as if they're the same thing sometimes, especially in the context of the rest of eternity...

WHY? If the answer had teeth it would have bitten you and would have been clinging onto you as if it's life depended on it. If it had eyes, it would have been staring you in the face this entire time. And God saw the light, that it was good; and God divided the light from the darkness. -...

Relevant: https://theweeklyworldview.com/surviving-the-death-cult/

Why do you both assume that "neandertals" were anything other than humans? Comparing them to "beasts" is inhumane. They were HUMANS. Ancient humans, sure, but humans nonetheless. Not a cross between human and beast. Not beasts. HUMANS! https://kgov.com/neandertal

And God said: “This is the sign of the covenant which I make between Me and you, and every living creature that is with you, for perpetual generations:I set My rainbow in the cloud, and it shall be for the sign of the covenant between Me and the earth.It shall be, when I bring a cloud over the...

Not synonyms, no. AION is the root word for AIONION. Because AION is a noun, AIONION is an adjective.

Why does the light have to be fixed? Why can't God create light that does not have a source from which it emanates? What is "The YEC context"? I'm talking about the Bible. Again, the context is the Bible, not what "YEC" thinks or wants or needs. Addressed by someone else.

G165 AION

That's on you, then. But I've tried again to make it easier to understand below. Sure, it's similar, at least. It's not. Sure it does. "Times age-long" means something, since words and phrases mean things, as you correctly say. Perhaps putting the adjective before the noun it describes...

See post #3 where I explained it. No one can, because it's irrational. You cannot have "before" time, because "before" is a time word, and only has meaning in the context of time. In other words, time is a prerequisite of creation, ergo, time cannot have been created,