Search results

Let's move this discussion to a different thread. We're already off-topic as it is. Feel free to mention me in the new thread.

We do know a little bit. Nothing specific, but we do know a few things. For example, as I noted in my post above yours, we know that the most important thing to God is relationships, and because God is relational, and because God is triune, we know that there would have been fellowshipping...

So then you agree with RD that God has always existed, but the universe has not? The really weird part of your belief is that you believe that I believe that God "lived in a sort of suspended animation and did nothing for an eternity." Nothing could be further from the truth. Wrong. The...

Is the universe a created "thing"?

For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one.And there are three that bear witness on earth: the Spirit, the water, and the blood; and these three agree as one. - 1 John 5:7-8...

I think the NKJV has it beat, though there are a few minor issues it has. What error? This is a genetic fallacy. The origin of something has no bearing on its validity. Say what you want about Wescott and Hort, their Greek New Testament they produced is one of the most accurate and So...

And that would be.... which one, exactly? Most of us here are NOT KJO. See kgov.com/kjo. Wrong. The only way to arrive at the truth of God's word is to study God's word. Hermeneutics are just tools to use. Using the wrong hermeneutics will result in a poor understanding of His word...

So if I send you a present for Christmas, does that mean you received it? God chose to save all mankind by sending His Son to die for all mankind. What mankind does with that offer of salvation is on man, not God. Straw man. But to Israel he says: “All day long I have stretched out My...

And you're not doing the same in reverse? I prefer the NKJV. I use YLT occasionally, but it's by no means the one I rely on, and it's not my "go-to" version for a reason, the NKJV being generally closer to the original meaning of the text than other versions, but it is by no means the "perfect...

Saying it doesn't make it so.

No one is going to go through each and every one of those links to read everything there. Do you not know your own position well enough to discuss it here? Make the argument yourself, please. I'm not saying you can't post links, but if you're not even going to bother making the argument for...

https://theweeklyworldview.com/act-of-god/ Links to the stories mentioned here that are not present in this post can be found at the link above. Act of God Posted on November 28, 2021 Tune in and hear America’s most attractive audio engineer and her host hope for an act of God against the mania...

Mr. Archer was wrong, and the author of that page is wrong for agreeing with him. And to use your very words (not that I agree with it necessarily, but to point out your hypocrisy): "Because that statement was written by a flawed individual makes it an unsupported assumption and unsupported by...

No one says it was. Yet it does cover real events that happened. The Bible may not be a science textbook, but the things it says are verifiable. That means science can be done to test it. Proverbs 25:2 No, but he was directly inspired by God to write them. Forget Moses, God has an...

Well, no, "earth science" says that the universe had a creator. The "scientists," on the other hand, want you to believe otherwise.

This is the Creation Science section. Not Religion. You laugh, but only because you're a fool.

You're certainly welcome to believe whatever you like. But your beliefs don't match reality. The evidence shows that the earth is young, despite what atheistic and old-earth creationist scientists say. Reality is that the earth is 7-10 thousand years old, not billions.

NOT NECESSARILY. ONLY if he has placed his faith in Christ does God save him. Wrong. As the very verse you are about to quote says, "We shall be saved by His.... death?" NO! "We shall be saved by His LIFE!!!" I literally just got done telling you: We are RECONCILED by His DEATH. We are...

You clearly don't even know what "false dichotomy" means, do you? It means that you're presenting your argument as if there are only two possible choices, when there is the possibility of a third or more. "Either this or that" while excluding "the other." What I said stands.

To clarify, it was poor wording on my part. Allow me to reword it: "We" are not the elect. This should have been obvious, considering I was pointing out that Israel is called "the Elect Lady," among other things. The problem you face, Derf, is that we in the body of Christ are not "CHOSEN"...