Search results

I am using Daves own comment from earlier, where he said that the Sun and Moon rotate above the Earth about 1000 miles above it. (or something like that). I'll find it after I post this, there's a few other posts I want to address of his, and provide the Post number here: ______ Also, according...

First of all, do you realize that you're saying the stars are much closer to Earth than the Sun and Moon are? If that's the case, then we should see stars in front of the moon, and not have the moon eclipse them. This is NOT REALITY. Ok, first of all, read this...

True Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

I'm still waiting for Dave to answer my question. Maybe he got scared and abandoned the thread... Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Let's just have everyone head straight south to do it too, so that if the earth is flat, we'll all be heading away from each other, but if it's a globe, we should all eventually meet at a certain point... Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Better yet, let's tear down that wall... It's just ice, right? Let's melt it! Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

I believe Dave said something about a wall of ice... page 2 or 3 (50 posts per page) I think... Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Can we know anything about the stars in your flat-earth's dome? Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

(Knight, if this is too much, let me know and I'll tone it down a bit.) Dave, If someone was looking in the direction of the cliff from sea level, then your statement would be correct. BUT THAT"S NOT WHAT WE WERE CALCULATING FROM! THAT'S NOT THE HEIGHT OF YOUR PHOTOS!!!! NOR IS IT THE HEIGHT WE...

Answer my question, you idiot. Can we know anything about the stars in your flat-earth's dome? Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

You are the idiot. We have just explained this to you THREE TIMES, and you still say it's not possible, even though we have told you it is. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Once again you utterly failed to not only grasp basic physics and mathematics, but you completely ignored what he said. I STRONGLY recommend you read his post again. Also, I gave a number of 75 feet above sea level, not 6 feet. The reason for that is that you DID NOT give a camera height for...

They would not be visible......... FROM SEA LEVEL! As I stated above, your photos WERE NOT TAKEN AT SEA LEVEL, and you DID NOT give the height of the camera, nor any indication of where the photo was taken. You're using a false equivalence fallacy to justify your position, and everyone in this...

Oh, and don't forget, we're not even taking into consideration refraction of the atmosphere yet. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

At sea level? That would be about 600 feet. But sea-level is not where your photo was taken. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

No kidding. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Fine, let's be generous (because I can't be certain from the photo) and assume that h0 = 75 ft. That means there's a 250 ft drop off from where one's line of site meets the horizon to the object, which on a 300 ft tall object, leaves 50 feet above the horizon. Sent from my Pixel XL using...

Correction for what I said above: "h0 = 0 feet" is sea-level. I'm talking about the photo you provided. The viewpoint looks to be higher than h0 = 0, and seems to be at least h0 = 60 feet, if not more. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

What is the person's eye height above sea level? Where sea level is h0, eye level is h-what? Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Not enough information to answer the question. Need to know what height one's eye would be. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app