Search results

Yes...already have converted to Judaism. Yet Paul tells them this: Romans 10:1-4 KJV — Brethren, my heart's desire and prayer to God for Israel is, that they [not "you", because Paul is not speaking to converts to Judaism] might be saved. For I bear them [not "you", because Paul is not speaking...

Proselytes are by definition part of Israel. As soon as they are considered part of Israel, they are no longer part of those who are being grafted in because of the unbelief of Israel--they are literally part of Israel that are mostly rejecting their saviour. So it is logically incoherent to say...

And Gentlies. Paul was talking to all three groups, who had joined together in one congregation. And the only way that makes sense is if they had heard of the reconciliation of Jesus Christ bringing those who were far off nigh by His blood (from Eph 2:13).It tells us here in the same chapter of...

Paul seems to be saying to the Roman church that somebody was cut out of something and the Roman church was grafted in. Romans 11:17 NKJV — And if some of the branches were broken off, and you, being a wild olive tree, were grafted in among them, and with them became a partaker of the root and...

Like the word "logos". 😉

I was being silly. Sorry it came across badly. ok

As long as they do it the right way next time, like Cuba, for example.

Anyone, as long as you are Black. and a woman, and assuming you don't know what a woman is.

Well! U annoys me, too. So there!

I thought it was going to be about using the seat heaters.

It's not a lie to withold some pieces of information, unless you first say you are going to tell the whole truth

To what purpose in our resurrection, or His, for that matter? Wouldn't it be easier to say that He blinded their eyes so that they didn't recognize Him rather than that He changed His appearance? Both might be in His power, but one is deceitful to those who love Him.

Enough that He didn't have to manufacture scars on a new body, for tge reason below. If so, then the scars He showed them were fake, or of something that were not intrinsically evidential to His resurrection. I don't think I'm taking that part too literally. 👍

For sure! And that's my point. I had said earlier in the thread that the reason I think God had to "go down and see" was not that He didn't know enough to make a righteous judgment, but that He wanted to see if the cause was hopeless, at least so far as the circumstances warranted*. That's part...

And often tests the people to see if they will repent, like Noah preaching righteousness and Jonah going Nineveh.

Don't you think that a God who can hear from heaven could also see from heaven? 2 Chronicles 7:14 KJV — If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and...

Then He needed the "gory details" to make a righteous judgment? And His other sources of information are not trustworthy, apparently?

But in the Sodom case, God goes down to see whether what He has been told is true. He hasn't chosen to not know, but to know better.

I've heard that here before, but it doesnt make sense. If God chooses not to know something, doesn't He already have to know it well enough to choose not to know it?

To all of us. But we have His Spirit in us, to make it less and less of a challenge each day