Search results

He was always likely to be, given that it would require a two thirds majority to convict. The fact remains that the majority actually supported such, including Republicans.

Um, seriously, you think that those who voted against Trump are actually worshipping Satan? Is that honestly what you believe?

The American people voted for a removal of the former president in majority. Now, you can call foul, cry fraud and such all you want but it's not the case. Deal with it. Good for those Republicans who have a conscience.

It was always likely to be the case, but before you celebrate too much, bear in mind that the vote was 57 - 43. The majority voted in favour of conviction so it isn't that much of a highlight to add to Trump's curriculum vitae...

Exactly...

Yes, he will go down in history as the only president to serve a single term, be impeached twice, lose the popular vote, lose by the same margin he claimed was a landslide victory in 2016. What a record... I did see Jamie Raskin and it's tragic as to what happened. A principled man indeed...

Better than the "wall"...:D

Hmm, well, the truth is that Trump lost the election. That doesn't upset me. :)

Oh, the one that never actually got built?

Well, no, but you keep on parroting the usual if you want.

That's why it seems to smack of obvious metaphor. One argument that used to be prevalent on here (and possibly still is) regarded how it would be unfair on the "saved" if God allowed everyone into "Heaven" and didn't consign the "heathen" into hell because paradise could be usurped. Yet, if...

That was pretty much a given before it started considering the percentage that was needed in order to convict. However, the damage has been done. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/feb/13/donald-trump-impeachment-trial-analysis-acquittal

Quite, it's patently obvious that the rioters were far right MAGA activists, even before the new footage that came out. Again, kudos to officer Eugene Goodman.

Are you trying to blow up irony meters? If I believed anything regardless of data/evidence then I'd buy into Qanon...I will continue to wear a mask because there's plenty of evidence to suggest that they protect other people, despite the fact that they're not pleasurable to adorn. If it's a...

Um, no, you aren't even if you've convinced yourself that you are and I have a thick enough skin to deal with anything you put forth regardless. It's simply better to avoid insults if you want to appear mature in an argument. Up to you obviously. Again, laws are based on common sense and if you...

Wasn't so much of a "boom" after all then...;)

Lame... https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/feb/12/michael-van-der-veen/trump-impeachment-defense-lawyer-wrongly-singles-o/

Along with a third of the angels. I reckon there's some obvious metaphor going on with that but for those who take it literally, why would anyone want to rebel in Heaven?

If that's the case, then yes, he is.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-mccarthy-rioters-impeachment-b1801775.html