Search results

I rather suspect the latter is well out of yours as well and Lindell most assuredly is a "quakk". Debunked all over the place.

You keep throwing this sort of stuff about and it only reflects badly on you. The truth of the matter is is that there's no substantive evidence for widespread voter fraud, end of. Plenty of whack a doodle claims and assertions but nothing of substance. If an accusation or claim is levelled then...

Exactly. Any evidence for a claim has to be substantial otherwise what's the point?

Now that's a reasonable posit.

Just more of the same bunk he'd already put out. Guy should stick to manufacturing pillows... https://factcheck.thedispatch.com/p/assessing-the-various-claims-in-mike

What am I supposed to be debunking exactly, a sentence of yours?

What 'massive evidence' of voter fraud? What 'credible allegations'? Do you understand what the term 'burden of proof' means?

Suspicions mean squat. Some people believe the earth is flat, doesn't make it so and you kinda do need proof for any claim to be taken seriously. Once again, the burden of proof is one those making the allegations, not on anyone to disprove anything. How's that worked out so far?

The burden of proof is on the one making the claim, that's it. You should know this by now. By all credible and verifiable standards, Trump lost the 2020 election.

Well, yes he did. All on record. It would just "magically disappear" last April and so forth. He lied to you. You seem to be okay with that. Regarding your latter, that's some "standard" for protocol isn't it? Was Raffensberger supposed to kowtow to Trump?

It's just flabbergasting. We're all human beings with foibles, quirks and the like but how something like 'Q' can actually dupe people to the extent that it has is something else.

Yak yak pretty much sums Lindell up. In case you've somehow forgotten, the burden of proof is on those making claims of fraud which have come to zero including 'my pillow guy'. This latest is given the same short shrift as previous. Guess why?

Yes he did, blatantly. All of those times where he was telling you that it was all under control and would disappear in Spring last year? Lies. Fact. Just as it's fact that he's on record in his own words for downplaying it and enjoying doing so also. Yet that seems to be all okay with you...

The video is a joke, just like Sidney Powell's kraken. It's not 'irrefutable evidence' of any sort and honest, intelligent people of any nationality don't have time for this conspiracy bunk. Reality time. Trump lost. Fair and square. Deal with it. There wasn't anything resembling this when he...

Yes he does, several. His lies regarding Covid and pathetic attempts to garner votes with Raffensberger for example. You might as well apply that verse to yourself if you're going to apply it to others because you're not acting any differently where it comes to your diatribes against those who...

Not really. Opinion polls aren't infallible as alluded to previous.

That still doesn't really address the whole 'ex wife' analogy. There's plenty of people who are divorced who have amicable relations so 'hateful bias' isn't even relevant to the point. Do you see anything even remotely negative about Trump?

There weren't any 'surprising flips'. They were forecast by major news and media outlets from election night itself and subsequently.

Then provide some 'irrefutable evidence' then. Should be simple enough if there is any, right? The floor is yours.

You didn't answer. Why the bizarre 'ex wife' analogy? Plenty of folk of any political persuasion are guilty of infidelity, hypocrisy and all manner else. Bracketing people into some ignorant box is just on you and it's also completely dishonest. Trump lied about Covid, that's a fact.