Search results

Sure I do, but I don't throw around silly 'fallacy' accusations as certain folk love to do as if it somehow makes an argument. No, they aren't. With the advent of forensic science and other procedures we have a much more accurate standard of establishing the likelihood of guilt or innocence...

No, it isn't but you sure do like to throw this kind of stuff around don't you? Are our standards more advanced in terms of science and the like now as opposed to the bronze age? Uh, yeah. There's no 'snobbery' whatsoever about that, it's just fact.

You're not being met with any.

That had absolutely nothing to do with what I wrote and is just another diatribe that can be dismissed accordingly.

What "stacked deck"? If she had this so called "proof" then why are her lawyers saying what they are? Do explain.

She expressed the truth and had the courage to do so. Plenty other republicans agree.

She wasn't.

If she found 'proof' then why is she backing away from the allegations and her lawyers citing the following: "No reasonable person would conclude that the statements were truly statements of fact" https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/mar/23/sidney-powell-trump-election-fraud-claims

What about Liz Cheney? Does she have to support the ongoing election fraud nonsense to count as a republican? Nope. She's one of those who has the guts to call it for what it is.

Yeah, so why has Sidney Powell started claiming that her allegations regarding such weren't to be taken seriously by reasonable people then? A billion dollar lawsuit perhaps?

The only evidence of any worth is the substantive sort, else it's worth what exactly? I don't reject God's word as much as you like to keep flinging that out in regards to me because I don't agree with you as to what God's standards are. Frankly, if you're going to go down that route...

See User Name's response. Mine echoes it.

Some 'witness' she was eh?

Seconded. I'm already on record here for saying that if such was uncovered I'd have no problem with results being overturned. No fan of Trump in any way, shape or form but fraudulent election rigging is inexcusable.

Would God's standard tolerate insubstantial evidence? It's all very well going back to the OT when such matters couldn't be established with more effective measures as we have today so would God be happy with the word of two or three witnesses in the present? The only kind of evidence that...

Tears what, the book? :D 😐

Fox News didn't seem too keen to air Trump's latest "speech" on Saturday at North Carolina. One wonders why... https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-republican-speech-north-carolina-b1860363.html

Well, punctuality and content still sorely lacking but other than that, well done!

So, about as much truth in that as punctuation then. Got it.

They must all be closet democrats in disguise...