Search results

Hmm, for once, your formatting seems to have gone a bit askew mid post but no matter. I'll address point by point. There was no 'whoosh' JR, just a bit of unintentional irony on your part. A bit like the time you asked me why I used so many words when I'd replied with a single sentence and you...

Then explain what this 'whoosh' supposedly comprised of, should be interesting. Um, no, it's subjective, just the same as if someone on the 'left' had constructed similar with different gradients. Which it isn't. A differing political view isn't 'evil' simply because it doesn't correspond...

There was no "whoosh" JR. Of course I can assert it, because it isn't objective. Classifying a differing political view as "evil" is broadcasting subjective bias, I doubt Enyart is particularly shy about it. If someone concocted a similar chart with conservatism as 'evil' then that again would...

The irony of your opening two sentences is priceless... You can assert that my opinion is wrong as much as you want, it's just your opinion and nothing more, it sure ain't fact and it sure ain't objective. Much like Bob's chart. Anything that has a gradient of right (good) and left (evil) has...

I doubt Kevin Costner would be too impressed... https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-rudy-giuliani-law-election-b1872405.html

They were at that. :)

Alpacas? Llamas? Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo...

Well, of course it doesn't in and of itself which is entirely the point. Neither does your telling me that my opinion is wrong make you right by the same token. Enyart's chart is simply one he's constructed with a biased and subjective opinion of the political spectrum. He's entitled to his...

No, it isn't an accurate representation of the political spectrum at all. It is simply one man's highly subjective and biased view of it, that's all. That you happen to agree with his highly subjective and biased opinion is one thing, it doesn't render it factual. Anyone can construct a chart...

Except it isn't as I outlined earlier. You're welcome to your own opinion of course as Enyart is to his but that chart is as representative of actual political viewpoints as a note in a fortune cookie.

Cite for 'tampering with evidence'? There weren't 'multiple problems' either. Trump just lost.

Because you say so?

Again, plenty of sane Americans including Republicans have accepted the results of the 2020 election.

JR, Enyart's chart is simply one of highly subjective and biased opinion, that's all. It isn't factual or true. That you may happen to agree with it doesn't validate it whatsoever. If you cared about accuracy you'd question it, not venerate it. People simply can't be compartmentalized into such...

I made no such claim. There are plenty of sane Americans who aren't democrats who have accepted the results of the 2020 election.

Again, of course it isn't and if this is all you've got as 'counter' then it isn't up to much. That chart is just one man's subjective opinion and doesn't reflect actual fact at all. If you want to buy into it then hey, you do so. It's not truth by any stretch.

Of course it isn't. If you think people can be so neatly compartmentalized into some little box then up to you but it's entirely subjective and has no foundation to it. Simple as that. Anyone can come up with something akin and it would just be the same.

Yeah...fantastic. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breitbart_News

You're a crazed conspiracy theorist because of the amount of spaced out bunk you post and expect others to take at face value. Not gonna happen. Nobody but nobody here has ever claimed that any given government is 'pure as driven snow' for starters.

The sane ones recognized the results of the 2020 election.