Search results

Why do you automatically assume promiscuity? A monogamous married couple may have no wish to start a family or not until they're ready etc. Do you condemn contraception methods?

I don't need your "help" in focusing thanks. His "point" as usual had no bearing in reality. Where have I stated or come close to stating anything about making people more responsible by taking away their constitutional rights? Hint: Never happened and the guy is a hamper short of a picnic...

If only you had any, valid ones anyway. Oh, and I thought you were ignoring me?

Well, that was a load of predictable unsupported bunk. You'll just lap up anything it would seem but even your own source condemns the Russian invasion of the Ukraine.

Well, ya know, must have had their reasons...

The petulance is strong with this one...

You mean apart from the fact they aren't? You mean apart from the fact that they invaded a sovereign country that had already disarmed itself of nuclear weapons with assurances that this sort of invasion wouldn't happen? You mean apart from the fact that the Ukrainian president is Jewish and...

“People like these are nasty, not smart .. they just talk, criticize and complain". Irony meters have now gone on strike...

Like so many others and yet he still prefers to see the emperor wearing clothes...

You can't "make people responsible" as if they can be programmed or something so once again, way off the mark there dude.

Restricting ownership is responsible and it affects a lot more than the right to bear firearms. If you're responsible then you have the right to own a gun, a dog, to work in the care sector etc etc. If you have a record of irresponsibilty, animal abuse, assault then you shouldn't own a gun, a...

Same here.

She makes a salient point. There's much clamouring around here about how a child should have the right to be born put post birth little in the way of rights or a lot of blather about how it should be parental responsibility. In the UK a child has the right to food, water, shelter, warmth, an...

Well, my contention is that nobody should be issued with or allowed to own a gun until stringent background checks have been carried out to ascertain whether they're fit to have one.

All of them? You sure that's not hyperbole on your part? In any event, specify how.

Yup, clear as day.

Not sure what you're getting at with that.

Who says I get "all worked up"?

I was referring to the poster "User Name" who I shortened to "UN". Poster names often get shortened to initials on here. They haven't to me, personally. They generally bemuse/amuse me in equal measure.

I already have. Tighter restrictions, background checks etc.