Search results

So a non answer on both. There's a shock...

It shouldn't be great, it should be the norm and thankfully is. There's a glaring double standard going on however when those who claim to be pro life deny that a child has the basic rights to that needed for survival. I wasn't arguing what you suggest at all.

Ideally the needs of the child should be met by his/her parents but when parenting fails what then JR? The child doesn't have food, water, shelter? Just bad luck of the draw that he/she got stuck with lousy parents?

Unless that has a list of rights for children to have access to essentials (and I'm presuming it doesn't) then not interested thanks.

Rather, our government has a welfare system in place and not going down this pointless and irrelevant sidebar again thanks. Frankly, if you don't support a child having access to the basic necessities for life then please stop pretending to care for children. I'm well aware that if a parent...

It's hardly a "paradise" and why on earth would you consider a country that declares that children have the right to essentials to life to be one exactly? Then it would be held accountable for failing as has happened on occasion.

That's quibbling over terminology isn't it? Do you agree that all children should have access to the necessities at least for survival once born? Otherwise all of this wrangling over abortion is empty and only underlines the point that the nun in UN's link alluded to. That many people are pro...

Why was it specifically for that time? Do you regard it as a command that all men should get married?

Which apparently solely means the right to be born?

They do where I live and rightly so. So, once a child is born then what's it supposed to do if their parent doesn't meet those needs?

Surely all children have the basic rights to food, water, warmth, shelter and education?

Some people who get married don't want children. I thought you might regard contraception as sinful which is why I asked. Not all Catholics agree however but that's the same within any belief really.

"Q"'s been playing a game with you from the get go. Sad thing is, you're still falling for it..

Do you agree that children should have rights after they've been born? Food, water, shelter, education etc?

For some hardliners on the score - this one. Some think that any form of contraception is sinful also.

You think that verse is a command? So, are all those men who don't get married sinning or something? Paul seemed to have comments about how it's good for people not to be in marriages but it being better to get married than to burn with passion? There's many a single parent who do a better job...

Again, well aware of what you think men and women should do in regards to sex and marriage but it's ultimately up to each individual on that score. Single mothers aren't obliged to find a husband at all, nor should they be expected to. If they want one, fine, if they don't, also fine.

Well, I was already familiar with your take on contraception in fairness so none of this is news to me. You aren't in a position to guarantee what is nothing more than an opinion however and your latter was and still is bizarre. It's up to a woman if she wants a relationship with a man...

This is why I'm asking if you condemn any form of contraception, I know where you stand with abortion obviously. Is it promiscuous to you if a monogamous married couple have regular sex but use contraception as they either don't want kids or not until further down the line? The parameters for...

Well, that's simply your opinion and my question was directly related and directly on topic so it shouldn't be difficult for you to answer?