Search results

I don't think he ever really considered what anyone else said. Debated against it (to a minimal extent), but actually considered it? No.

So instead of responding to the arguments presented, you're going to post yet another pro-flat earth video? And not only that, but one that in the video thumbnail claims that sunlight doesn't actually come from the sun? Now you've moved to the absurd, Dave, no one can take you seriously anymore.

Welcome back to the thread. Haven't seen you in a while. How have you been?

What's interesting is that the thumbnail for that video looks remarkably similar to the experiment I described earlier.

Yeah, no. I have better things to do with my time.

I don't see any clouds that are behind any celestial objects. I see light shining through the very thin clouds in your previous post that claims there are "two horizons", but I don't see any clouds behind the sun.

And you're only considering 2 pieces of the watch, and ignoring the rest. Dave, do you know for a fact that where the rays of the sun hit are directly below the gaps in the clouds? Because if they are not, then it comes down to a matter of perspective, and not just simply "they don't look...

You have not addressed all of my points, Dave, and yes, they are all relevant, whether you think they are or not. You don't consider your arguments refuted because you refuse to consider the arguments that refute yours. And the majority of people reject God because of the people who...

Also, that's circular reasoning. "The sun is close because the rays angles indicate that it's close. And they indicate that the sun is close because the sun is close." And yes, it does apply, Dave. Is the sun a single 1 dimensional point of light? Or is it a 3D object that has a surface that...

Did you do the experiment I gave you?

Dave, As far as I'm aware, no one here has said there are two suns, so please don't make that strawman argument. Dave, going back to the parallel bars analogy, can those two bars be attached at 90 degrees to the same wall? The obvious answer is yes. IN THE EXACT SAME WAY, the beams of light...

Dave, if you have two parallel bars, one on each side of your head, and you're looking down their length, do they appear to be getting closer farther away? Do they appear to be pointing at something that's really close? If so, does that not contradict the fact that the bars are parallel? I tell...

So instead of responding to my points, you're ignoring them because you don't like how long my posts are? Dave, it's no wonder you can't understand anything when you have the attention span of a goldfish. Respond to my points please. And feel free to break down my sentences to respond to each...

Knight isn't talking about different times of the year, Dave, he's talking about different times of the day. Big difference. Dave, everything is moving through space, the sun, the moon, AND the earth. Why is that so hard for you to comprehend? No, the earth is moving around a mobile sun...

I don't see a source, could you point it out here: ----- Was everything that they said wrong? Or just some of it? How do you know which parts are wrong and which are not? Fathers of the Physical Sciences who velieved in the Creator God (or at least the ones relative to this discussion)...

Source? Then why even bring it up at all? So if you were to travel down the tracks, the distance between them would get smaller and smaller as you traveled? They aren't parallel? Or do the tracks spread apart when Dave approaches them? :kookoo:

Here. We. Go. https://i.imgur.com/WI9ePTE.jpg https://www.reddit.com/r/space/comments/6je76h/the_sun_photographed_from_the_same_spot_at_the/ https://www.reddit.com/r/space/comments/6je76h/slug/djdk2e0

I'd say his heavenly FOV (field of view) is set to a really high number. . . . . (For those who don't get it, FOV determines how much you can see on your computer screen in a videogame. Google FOV for more info. Anyways, a higher FOV tends to make things at the edges of the screen larger...

E.G. XXy or Xyy

If a person has an X and a Y chromosome, the person is male. If the person has two X chromosomes, the person is female. Anything else is a mutation and is not natural. I said evidence, not proof, but it hardly matters. Do you want to know what that evidence is? Request a free copy of this...