Search results

Hey, GT, talk about the topic of the thread. Otherwise, you're giving Knight and Sherman a reason to boot you from the thread.

Someone who defends stupidity is himself stupid. As my middle school science teacher said to the troublemakers and slow learners in my class... DBD... Don't Be Dumb.

Boo hoo :mock:

Hey, GT, talk about the thread topic, not your personal beliefs. No one wants to hear them here. This is a thread for cold, hard FACTS.

You asked a question. That's not stating your beliefs. Nor was it relevant to the topic being discussed in this thread. Participate or leave. Knight Sherman

What does this have to do with the thread?

No, David, not "We'll see." It IS evidence against the flat earth, and hard evidence. You can't just dismiss it as if it's unimportant.

Because the FE side never uses CGI... :mock: Argument from incredulity. Your objection is dismissed. Just asserting your FE position over and over again does not answer GE claims. See how that works? The difference is, Dave, that we have shown why our position is valid with arguments that...

Dave, have you ever seen Bob Enyart's "The Planets, Stars, and the Bible" video? If ever there was a final nail in the coffin of this ridiculous conspiracy theory, this would be it (at least for those who believe the Bible). In it, he talks about the constellations. He talks about the stars...

Let's keep politics out of this, shall we? Stay on topic. Appeal to popularity. Then the onus is on you to show how it's CGI. ALL proof by (repeated) assertion. You keep making blanket statements without backing them up, and then when called out on it, you ignore the responses. As far as...

Even more stupid to (continue to) defend something that has already been refuted a thousand times over by me and others on this and the original thread. And God says two or three witnesses shall establish a matter... Size of Australia, measured distance of sun from earth when sun is .1 degree...

And there it is, claiming victory because no one wants to listen to stupidity.

Man, you and I are on a roll haha

There's a discussion for that going on here: https://theologyonline.com/showthread.php?p=5256958

You must be blind, Dave. Look at the picture you posted. Compare mine with yours. Do you see that little circle in the middle of what you call the sun? That's the actual sun, Dave. So yes, Dave, I don't just "think I can see" where the flare begins, I highlighted where it DOES begin.

Yes, he can. So the land moves? This has been answered, but you ignored it. I know it has been answered because I answered it myself. No, I'm not going to redo the math, and no, I'm not going to go find my post containing the math. Figure it out yourself.

Ok, and?

No, because I can go out and see the real thing whenever I want. Something you should do.

Once again, you didn't read what I wrote. I said your argument assumes that "four corners" is literal. And it doesn't imply flat earth at all. Dave, how many corners does a tetrahedron have? 4 Is it flat? NO Which means that "four corners" doesn't necessarily mean that whatever object...

Then don't lump things that on their own have nothing to do with either side into the side of the atheists. You're the one who brought it up, Dave.