Search results

Insulting the admin of this forum isn't going to get you very far...

:troll:

:AMR: Another non-sequitur, and even a bit of question begging... That's what ya call a two-fer! "I know how to drive, therefore I've never driven from Berlin to Moscow." That's pretty much what you just said, just change the method of travel and the start and end points.

So you're rejecting basic trigonometry? You're rejecting the Pythagorean Theorem? Mind, how many degrees do the angles on a triangle add up to? If one of the angles is 90°, making the triangle a right triangle, and another angle is 1° (one), how many degrees is the third angle? If ∆ABC has...

By the way, this falls under "proof by (repeated) assertion" fallacy.

I mean, it's not like they couldn't go around multiple times... :idunno: Why can't you refute the posts made by Clete and the rest of us that show mathematically, even using your side's numbers, that the earth cannot be flat?

That would be nice

Whatever happened to Dave? This thread is starting to accumulate cobwebs...

https://archive.org/details/Apollo11Audio/180-AAA.mp3

Bob talked about the FE nutjobs on Friday's show. https://kgov.com/bel/20180817

Verse please? I feel like you're speaking about a verse in Revelation, but it could also be in The Prophets... This has been addressed. From the point of view of someone on the surface of the earth, the Earth ceasing to spin for a bit would cause the sun to cease moving in the sky. Movement is...

You really should stop making this argument. It's been refuted already.

http://media2.kgov.com/audio/20180730-BEL151.mp3 http://media2.kgov.com/audio/20180814-BEL162.mp3

That's called moving the goalposts, Dave. No one made the argument that they're infallible. It's not hard to check someone's work to make sure the results they give are accurate. More moving the goalposts. :AMR:

You don't even know what stellar parallax is, do you? Do you know what the word "parallax" means? Because the way you just used it is probably one of the stupidest comments I've seen you make yet, and there have been a lot of them.

No, Dave, it doesn't. This is where stellar parallax comes into play. Again, YES IT CAN. It just takes time and effort to do. But you're not willing to take the time or put in the effort, are you?

Dave, this is you failing to comprehend the scale of the universe again. The North star is 433.8 LIGHT YEARS away. That's 2.55 × 10^15 miles. Or if you prefer longhand... 2,550,000,000,000,000 miles away. 12,427,423,844 miles is hardly a stone's throw away. Add to that the fact that Polaris is...

No Dave, it wasn't. I've been paying attention to this thread almost since the beginning of the original thread, and you have NEVER addressed the size of Australia.

No, he didn't. Or at least, he never did address it. Whether or not he had the opportunity to, I can't say.

Eh, "not impossible" and "possible" have slightly different connotations.