Search results

Such businesses supply (through wages) the means of purchasing food, toiletries, and medicine. Ergo, essential to not only the business owners themselves, but also to the people employed by them. But we know you would rather have everyone sucking on the government's teat than earning an honest...

Define "non-essential." I assert that there is no such thing as a "non-essential" business, because it is essential to the owner of the business.

According to your doctrine: Because their Creator has planned for them to be that way. Because their Creator has planned for them to be that way. Because the saved's Creator has planned for them to be able to see it. Because the unregenerate's Creator has planned for them to be that way.

Think "sustained epidemic" because of the lockdowns.

Word games won't get you out of this, chair.

I didn't say that. Don't put words in my mouth. Read what I said again.

Figure it out, Chair. If the epidemic is real partly because of the lockdowns, what does that imply?

Only for tyrannical governments. Otherwise no, they're simply evil. Partly because of the lockdowns.

They have banned it pending more information.

As much as I want to agree, I'm sure that Churchill actually was doing his best for his people... and you can't punish someone for actions their descendants might take.

Do you not care anything at all for those around the world who, as a result of such lockdowns, are experiencing such things? Or are you too focused on yourself to care? That much is obvious. They're more focused on making themselves great at the expense of their citizens. Wasn't that what...

One great benefit of the lockdown is that people cannot get their food from stores, or their medicine in the hospitals. So they save money, lose a lot of weight, but especially.... they don't have to listen to the scientists who are speaking out about how what's being done is hurting people...

Go read the article W2G posted. No, governments are not using actual science to guide their actions, because everything they have done runs CONTRARY to everything that has been learned in the past 200 years of medical progress.

Likewise. No doubt in my mind that I would do that.

Says the tin-foil hat wearing sheep.

All your best scientists say to wear a mask, social distance, et al. The science say such things DO NOT work for the virus. I'm gonna go with what the science says, not with what scientists who disagree with the science say.

OF COURSE YOU DON'T! Because if you did, you'd have your tush handed to you on a platter. Read what I said again. That should answer your question.

And you would be wrong, because the actual science says otherwise.

And yet, here you are, responding to it... But not blindly, and we're told to NOT obey them if they violate God's laws. That's a funny idea, a deist attempting to school a Christian on what the Bible says. I'm less ignorant than you are when it comes to things concerning the Bible.

I think you're splitting hairs. Because it accurately reflects reality. Even a broken clock is right twice a day. No, not "regularly." On occasion I do, though it does seem to be decreasing. Because they said something that is right/correct, and for no other reason than that. Again...