Search results

But it DOES harm them, regardless of how immediate the effects of that harm manifest. No thanks.

He's not spamming. He's challenging your position.

I see it at all hours of the day. I see it on people who are in their work vehicles. I see it on people who are on their way to work. I see it on people who are leaving work. I see it on other truck drivers going down the road. It's stupidity.

I, a trucker, see it on a daily basis, multiple times per day. I keep an extra watchful eye on them.

But you never respond to criticism of your explanations, reverting to things like "I've explained it elsewhere" or "did you read my OP" or simply mocking the person who is challenging you. I myself have put a straightforward question to you multiple times, asking you about what scripture says...

This is why it's a mistake for carriers to not allow drivers to carry personal defense weapons. If she had had one, here's what might have happened: She would have rolled up on that intersection, seen the protesters rioters, slowed her vehicle to avoid running over any of them, but still...

Stopping the truck was her first mistake. Rolling down her window was her second mistake. Her third was to remain in that location when people started climbing on her truck. She seems like just another steering wheel holder. PS: Perhaps working for a company that would send her to do...

Yet you won't explain how, will you?

You should do the same. Seriously. And before you say it, me too.

No. You automatically swallow everything others interpret from the Bible that the Bible does not say, and you reject what the Bible says plainly.

Because they are humans. Humans are not apes. That's nice. The fact that they had children with other humans at all tells us that they were human. That's nice. So what? It doesn't change the fact that they were humans.

https://www.sciencenews.org/article/europe-oldest-known-humans-mated-neandertals-dna-fossils This is because Neandertals were humans.

Then you should read this:

Here's three instances: “Speak to Aaron and his sons, and to all the children of Israel, and say to them: ‘Whatever man of the house of Israel, or of the strangers in Israel, who offers his sacrifice for any of his vows or for any of his freewill offerings, which they offer to the Lord as a...

The problem is that you also claim that the credit for a man REJECTING God ALSO goes to God. Which is false. God is not responsible for when someone rejects Him.

Saying it doesn't make it so. Can he do so (or even can he refuse to do so) after the Father calls/draws him? So you now agree that man CAN come to Christ after the Father calls him, as per John 6:44, 65? Chapter verse that says that when God calls/draws someone, that that is "new birth."

The point is that they DID interbreed, according to the evidence. To reiterate: Neandertal DNA is closer to the DNA of modern humans than the DNA of two chimps is to each other's. In other words, Neandertals are closer to being humans genetically than a chimp is to another chimp. Humans and...

No, Credit for salvation ALWAYS goes to God. Credit for REJECTING God, for rejecting salvation, goes to the one who rejects it.

Irrelevant to this discussion. The point is that just because someone is called, drawn, is being worked on inwardly, that is NOT a guarantee (as you claim) that someone is saved/regenerated/etc. Chapter verse which says that "divine power" causes someone to believe, as opposed to only giving...

This is false. DNA doesn't lie. They are genetically closer to modern humans than two living chimps of the same species. https://kgov.com/neandertal http://www.britannica.com/topic/Neanderthal/Neanderthal-classification More recently, however, it was reported that Eurasians generally carry...