Search results

Well, yes, they are, and the video does just that. Think he's wrong? PROVE IT! I dare you. My yardstick is if something is repeatable, verifiable. You know, like actual science. Last I checked, anyone can buy a vape stick and a mask and do the exact same test. You still have not answered...

The not-a-gospel you preach is nonsense. And it certainly is not THE gospel of Christ.

Because you say so?

Of course they are! The problem is that unlike every other nation that rewrites their history, which shows them to be the "good guys" and attempts to glorify themselves and show how great they are, the history of the nation of Israel recorded in the Bible is NOT one of glorification, it doesn't...

Yes it is, and I showed you where. You DO need to make an actual argument. So far, all you've done is posturing and claims that the Bible is wrong. :nono: You have it backwards. The events in Genesis 1-6 came before the Mesopotamians even existed. They got their stories from the division...

Thank you for explaining. However, Noah sinned because of his already extant sinful nature. Creation had already fallen from perfection. There was no going back to it, not yet at least. No pretending here. Generic claims like this presented without evidence can be dismissed without...

Please format your post appropriately. The way you're formatting your post makes it hard to understand who is saying what. Here's a link to help you with that: https://theologyonline.com/help/bb-codes/ If you need further assistance with formatting your posts, please contact me, and I will do...

There was more to my post than the kgov interview with Dr. Clem Persaud. Try reading past the first line of a post sometime. Go back and read it again.

Because they clearly and repeatably demonstrate the opposite of what said entities are claiming. Nope. Of course not. However, when it is demonstrable that the opposite of what such entities claim is true and verifiable, there is reason to doubt said entities. You seem fascinated with...

No. This is fun, isn't it? Nope. Never claimed to be. What I HAVE claimed is the ability to see with my eyes and think with my brain, and to reason. Something "Arthur Brain" apparently can't do. Again, non-sequitur.

K. Why did you bother posting in this thread again if you aren't going to consider the evidence?

https://kgov.com/bel/20201002 https://cogforlife.org/wp-content/uploads/CovidCompareMoralImmoral.pdf https://cogforlife.org/2020/06/04/sanofi-pasteur-discontinues-aborted-fetal-polio-vaccine-using-moral-cell-lines-instead/

My point remains. Dead babies were used in the development of some of the vaccines.

Well, no, I'm not. You clearly don't know what an appeal to authority is. Allow me to define it for you, from Wikipedia: An argument from authority, also called an appeal to authority, or argumentum ad verecundiam, is a form of argument in which the opinion of an authority on a topic is used...

I think the arguments you and marke have been making ignore the fact that many of the vaccines that have been created were done so by using the body parts and tissues of dead babies. If there was any reason to reject the vaccines, that would be it, because it would be immoral to approve of such...

Superior to whom? Finite? Who said humans were finite? Humans, like angels, were created to last forever. Sorry, the creation was corrupted once. Not twice. Again? Because that's not the God of the Bible. You're arguing against a straw man, Caino. Please stop. Once more, ripping...

Because I'm not claiming that "because he's an expert, therefore he's right." Because the video shows how ineffective masks are against stopping aerosols. The good doctor doesn't just claim it. He demonstrates it to be so. But you just can't believe your lying eyes, can you? I have the...

Yes, and? "Cast into the lake of fire." Not "destroyed." Not "annihilated." Still extant. What "second creation"? God created once, in a six-day period, at the beginning of creation. I didn't just imply that. That's what I said. And? Why is it God's fault when His creation, which has...

What part of "knew it was a possibility and thus implemented contingencies into His creation? What part of "He cannot destroy something that He created to be indestructible" do you not understand? Where did I say such? The what? Oh, do you mean Revelation? Just say Revelation then...

... says the mask-wearer...