Search results

https://theologyonline.com/threads/the-new-updated-10-tol-commandments.9648/ This applies to thread titles too.

Ignoring my posts won't make them go away. Please respond to the posts where I have challenged your assertions. No, it hasn't. Well, no, it means "the entire world," as in, all humans. What @beloved57 means by this is actually: "The word cannot be given a meaning that ultimately...

What about if God went to the cross, would that be a "performance of God" that would allow people to come to God? Well it's certainly enabled by God, but what specific action is done by God for that to happen? Is it possible in your mind that the answer is Christ's death on the cross, burial...

Are roughly one-half of the problem. The other roughly one-half is the Republicans. So are Republicans. In fact, most parties are full of idiots.

False. Again, as background: "Witness" doesn't necessarily mean "eyewitness." It means evidence or eyewitness. For example: Let's say a woman was raped while she was away from the town getting water from a well, but she managed to rip off a piece of the man's cloak or clothing during the...

Except "mooslim" isn't a new term, either. And as UN made mention of... You're going after me for "hateful speech," when we have a woman saying she literally hates whites simply because they're white... Among other things that are FAR more hateful than the word "mooslim."

-cy. It's because of democracy. It's because people think it's ok to vote on God's laws.

Indeed I am! In what way is calling muslims "mooslims" hateful?

Once again, ignoring my posts won't make them go away.

Therefore I exhort first of all that supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks be made for all men,for kings and all who are in authority, that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and reverence.For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our...

SAYING IT DOESN'T MAKE IT SO. And what would you do if I had made the same claim to revelation from God that "God revealed to me that he and you are wrong"? What then? I won't, of course, because there's no way that such a claim can be verified. Rather, I rely on the revealed word of God...

Her name (and her looks) make me think she's middle-eastern. Another mooslim, perhaps? Wouldn't be surprised if she was. Regardless, her statements in the recording should have immediately prompted an investigation, and her statements here should have instantly prompted police to kick in her...

You cannot determine the worth of any evidence you reject without consideration, because of some arbitrary standard set by some men. Meaning that the only way to know if a piece of evidence is substantive is to make careful inquiry into it. Hence: “One witness shall not rise against a man...

Ignoring my posts won't make them go away, B57. He's wrong, of course. Yes, we are justified by God alone. But we as humans bear the responsibility (or as Dr. Leighton Flowers puts it, the "response-ability") for either accepting or rejecting that justification. Christ made the first move...

THEN QUOTE THE VERSE! But you won't, because it DOES NOT SAY, "That they may know only You, the true God," nor does it say, "That they may know only You, the only true God." Here's what it ACTUALLY SAYS!: And this is eternal life, that they may know You, the only true God, and Jesus Christ...

And by that you mean, "You will never see what I think is truth." Unfortunately, Keypurr, I understand, see, comprehend, whatever word you want to use, PERFECTLY, what you believe. But regardless of what I believe, you ARE WRONG because it contradicts what the BIBLE says, which IS truth. Only...

Yes, yes, I agree with the verse. Why does it have to be "new birth" of someone? Why can't it be "Christ is born on earth and dies on the cross"? Chapter verse for those things. Because my Bible says: Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; old things have passed away...

NO HE DOESN'T! Did you even BOTHER to read past the first line of my post!? I literally quoted scripture of an instance where HE DID NOT! I read just fine. Says you. Scripture contradicts you: The Lord is not slack concerning His promise, as some count slackness, but is longsuffering...

HERE'S ANOTHER SET OF PASSAGES THAT SAYS GOD IS WILLING TO DO SOMETHING BUT MAN IS NOT!! But to Israel he says: “All day long I have stretched out My hands To a disobedient and contrary people.” - Romans 10:21 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans10:21&version=NKJV I have...

No, He doesn't always! HE EVEN SAYS SO HIMSELF! “O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the one who kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to her! How often I wanted to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you were not willing! - Matthew 23:37...