Search results

Are you not able to answer his question?

Once again, taking scripture out of context. Now I, Paul, myself am pleading with you by the meekness and gentleness of Christ—who in presence am lowly among you, but being absent am bold toward you. 2 But I beg you that when I am present I may not be bold with that confidence by which I intend...

It makes no difference that you have scripture to back up what you're saying, B57. The problem is that you're reading what you believe INTO scripture, when the scripture, even though when you read it the way you want it to be read says exactly what you want it to say, DOES NOT ACTUALLY SAY that...

It's called confirmation bias. It's called eisegesis. NEITHER are good ways to study scripture. You should let scripture speak for itself, not read your beliefs into it.

Post #12, my first post in this thread. You ignored it. Post #17 was pointing out that you could not answer marke's Post #14, because you gave a generic answer that uses lots of words, but says very little. Post #19 both challenged your premise, and even answer your question, though...

You should read the verses just prior to the passage you quote. Because the context doesn't let the passage you quoted use it in the way you're trying to use it. Jesus says to judge. Paul says to judge. In fact, just read the verses just following that passage, 1 Corinthians 6:2-5.

That's called Eisegesis, and confirmation bias. You should be doing the opposite, and letting scripture define your beliefs, not looking for scriptures that support your beliefs.

Then you're going to have to show me the difference, because otherwise you're wasting my time, which makes you a hypocrite for not wanting me to waste yours. But that's not what I've been doing, for the most part. Sure, one or two points here and there, I simply dismiss. But the majority of...

Why should I readdress something that I literally just got done addressing, B57? Don't believe I did? Go back and read through my responses to you.

Sorry, but I asked first. At least be willing to admit that there aren't any. Sorry, that's not how it works. YOU made the claim that the natural man does not have ears to hear. I made a positive argument, in RESPONSE to YOUR claim about the natural man, that there are NO verses that says...

In a different thread, of course :)

Why does it matter, when your premises are false? (Eternal, Historical, Subjective and Glorification)

Yes, I have. What you're doing is posting what you believe. And I, in response, am showing you how what you believe is wrong. That's not all I'm doing. When I do that, I'm trying to not go off on a tangent, and stick to addressing the main thrust of your argument. If I were to truly...

I was referring to how you were trying to arbitrarily tie "election" to salvation. Correct. Election is simply being called to accomplish a task. That's what it means. Wrong. Paul is talking about the remnant, the Jewish believers, who believed the Gospel of the Kingdom for Israel. Read...

Again, if you do not quote me, I won't be notified that you quoted me. Chapter verse that says that the natural man does not have ears to hear. There is none. One is made alive AFTER he accepts Christ. Not before. A man is not saved until AFTER he calls upon the name of the Lord, which is...

Not what I said. No argument here. We agree. What we don't agree on is what "election" means. You think it means salvation. I'm telling you that it means "called to accomplish a task." Chapter, verse. Does not say what you want it to say. I have addressed the "Jacob and Esau," and the...

Then why do you continue to conflate the two?

In other words, you have no idea.

Showing you how they're wrong is not dismissing them.

https://theweeklyworldview.com/sleeping-giant/ Links to the stories mentioned here that are not present in this post can be found at the link above. Sleeping Giant Posted on July 5, 2021 Join America’s most attractive audio engineer as she and her host poke America’s giant, sleeping populace...