Search results

Right, the mountains most certainly wouldn't have been as tall as the ones we see today. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

The problem with that answer is, how do we know where the dome perimeter meets the ice wall. If we knew that, then we could calculate roughly just how much water would be needed for such an event. The problem then becomes, where did all that water come from, and where did it all go, and what...

What? That the waters covered the tallest mountain by about 6m? Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Good point. I also want to add that if Dave here believes in the flat earth and the Bible, then he also has to explain how the Flood waters were about 6 meters above the tallest mountain before they started to recede, yet didn't overflow over what appears to be a wall only a few hundred feet...

Dave, you wanted to discuss the evidence for this, now let's discuss. How tall are the walls of ice surrounding the earth? Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Dave, I'm not asking because I'm lazy, I'm asking because I want to know if you know your own theory. So Dave, how tall are the ice walls surrounding the earth? Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

I need a number, Dave, not a picture where perspective could be ambiguous. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

How tall are the ice walls? Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

How far out does the earth extend beyond the ice walls? Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Flat Earther's inherently reject the concept of gravity, because it goes against their theory, their worldview. They also say there's a wall of ice keeping the oceans from spilling over. and even then, they're not even sure how far the ice goes. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline...

Dave, I'm saying that the camera is out of focus. You can't get a good idea of what anything looks like if you don't have a clear image of it. The images from that video are not clear enough to be used as evidence for either side. For all I know, the camera could be looking at someone on a tall...

Now, I'm no photographer, but I watched that video and could instantly see why you think that venus would look like the image you posted. The camera is out of focus. That's why you're getting all that "interference" (for lack of a better word). It's simply not powerful enough to see something...

Well let's consider something. For something that is supposedly so far away, which do you think will have equipment that can actually take clear pictures of the planets? NASA, with a really large budget, or some random person with a (comparatively) small budget? Sent from my Pixel XL using...

And yet the Southern Cross can be seen from Australia, Southern Africa, and Southern South America, which on a flat earth is NOT POSSIBLE, as all three of those locations are in different parts of the earth. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Oh, and one more from the "evil" NASA. https://youtu.be/2Oc-Ucx_4Ug Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

From a secular point of view, but the math is the same. https://youtu.be/hgcudPr73LU A demonstration of such. https://youtu.be/_XgYTP0kB7A Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

And please address the rest of my points with an actual counterargument, not just with your opinion. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Dave, just out of curiousity, do you know where that image was taken? Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

that would be true if the earth somehow formed via a naturalistic process, such as the "Nebular theory." But the earth was created by God, who designed the solar system so that the earth would tilt just enough for there to be seasons. He designed Uranus so that it would be spinning perpendicular...

That's barely an argument, Dave, I know you can do better than that. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app