Search results

No one is saying they aren't. And yet, again, as I pointed out earlier, America can and has made an effort to minimize innocent casualties.

You're mistaken. What Marke proposed was, and I quote: That precludes the killing of innocent people, and only includes executing those who are guilty of holding an entire nation hostage. And it certainly precludes "bombing another country to hell."

No, he's not. You sure about that? Precision strikes are a thing, you know... Not every bomb dropped has to be a nuke, and even tactical nukes can be used in the vicinity of friendlies with minimized risk.

:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

One of the comment tweets:

What you believe is irrelevant to the facts. You clearly don't understand what is meant by "age of accountability." I recommend reading the article I linked to you. Supra. Here's the link again: kgov.com/age-of-accountability

It wasn't David's mother. It was his father, just as it was HER father, that he inherited it from. The only three times the phrase "born again" is used in the New Testament are in John (2 times) and 1 Peter (once). Paul NEVER ONCE uses the term. Paul deals with the Body of Christ, while Peter...

I did not say that she gave her children a sinless nature. The answer to the following two questions should resolve your confusion. The answer to both 2 and 3 is that man's "sin nature" is not passed down through the woman, but through the man. This is the reason Jesus had to be born of a...

Good point! Wouldn't that make them a hypocrite then?

You're making the same error Lon makes, which I shall address below. Having existed forever is entirely rational, even though we as created (and therefore, we have a beginning) beings do not have a reference point from which to fully comprehend an infinite past. Existing "outside of time" is...

Who's advocating killing innocent women and children? No one. Absolutely no one. Sons, yes. Daughters? No. I'm against having women in the military. And yes, people die in wars. Although for the past 20 years or so, very few Americans and lots of Muslims have died in the middle east due to...

Except that it's extremely difficult to homeschool them these days. Single parents don't have the time to homeschool (having a spouse would solve this, however, hence why I recommend all single parents to marry asap), and private schools are generally more expensive (in terms of money) than...

To reply to this again, I would know when the evidence presented is logically consistent.

Our sin nature is, yes. But not sin itself. It's called the Age of Accountability, Marke. It's not poorly definable. It's just different for every human being. I suggest that you have a very poor understanding of the topic at hand, and are simply cherry picking verses that support your...

My answer is contained within kgov.com/doubts.

I advise that you read kgov.com/doubts. Bob Enyart was asked what do Christians doubt, and He gave a solid line of reasoning that I think applies here to this conversation.

No, it doesn't. First, Psalm 51:5 is talking about the mother, not David. Second, Paul says: I was alive once without the law, but when the commandment came, sin revived and I died. - Romans 7:9 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans7:9&version=NKJV In other words, prior to when...

No, we are born alive to God, innocent. We don't become sinners until we sin.

I choose to believe that which is supported by evidence. There is no convincing evidence that leprechauns exist, therefore I do not believe they exist. However, sufficient evidence has been shown that God exists, therefore I believe He exists, and such was a conscious choice on my part when I...