Search results

Lets put all the homo and pedo perverts in the military on that ship, and then have one or more of our battleships open fire on it and cause it to sink into the ocean.

That's nice. Now make a rebuttal. Appeal to the stone is a logical fallacy. Make the argument, or concede that you have none. By the way, simply responding to this post (and any future posts you respond to) is you changing. False. You, in responding to my post, changed from not having...

Yes. Showing mercy is, itself, a change, from initially not showing mercy upon someone who deserves punishment, to not punishing them. The fact that God is merciful doesn't change, but God DOES change by showing mercy. To restate the premise here: That God does not change... in his...

Marke was the one who stated it originally, but I'm starting to wonder if Lon believes it too...

@Omniskeptical fix your formatting.

For example? Such as? Which was because you can't differentiate between right and wrong, as you so clearly demonstrated, which is what he was responding to. His statement that you should not be a pastor had nothing to do with open theism, and had everything to do with you not being able to...

Jesus: I came forth from the Father and have come into the world. Again, I leave the world and go to the Father.” - John 16:28 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John16:28&version=NKJV Lon: "er, no..." Who's right? You'll have to explain how you arrived at that conclusion, because...

Beam, eye, remove it, hypocrite.

Do I smell a Battle Royale XV brewing? I volunteer as a referee! Aw.... That's a lot of tea...

You missed an "Eve" pun there... "... EVEr heard of him?" XD

Scripture. God created man from the dust of the ground and breathed life into him. The only man that came from God was the Man, Jesus Christ. EDIT: As for the second half of that phrase, you'll have to define what you mean by "sustained," since as far as I can tell, "sustained" is something...

Is not a term Paul used, but one that only Jesus and Peter used, both of whom were speaking DIRECTLY to the nation of Israel. There is currently no such thing today (nor for the past 1800 years or so) as a "born again believer," despite the fact that the church has misappropriated the term to...

Because Paul says otherwise. And we know that Paul, at the very least, did not contradict himself. No, just addressed to a different audience than the other books in the New Testament. No, let's NOT assume that, because that's called begging the question. It's a logical fallacy for a reason...

Did you choose to write such stupidity, or did God predestine you to do so? Which answer makes more sense in light of 1 Corinthians 14:33?

Locking the thread, as it's dead.

There's a difference between making it easy to understand the Bible, especially for children, and changing the Bible in order to satisfy a particular set of beliefs. Usually, the latter involves butchering the translation between what the Bible says in the Hebrew/Greek and the English. For...

For those in the Body of Christ, He is not our High Priest, no. For those who are under the New Covenant, yes, but no one alive today is under the New Covenant, not even for the past 1800 years. Please do so.

Saying it doesn't make so.

I didn't ask if you agree with the argument. We know you do. What I asked was, can you ask the same question? Can you articulate the same argument that you hold in such high esteem, or are you just someone who parrots that which he finds pleasing to the ear? Then what use are you? Then why...

"He had no answer to @brewmama, who 'cleaned up'. It began post 115 and was over post 217. It wasn't much of a contest either, sad to say.)"