Search results

Which came first, the chicken or the egg? Was he attracted to them first? Or did his exposure to them generate the paranoia? And if that type of content mentally radicalized him, then what were the preexisting conditions in him which fostered the radicalization?

Our political ideologies are very very different. While we both agree that government is good (neither of us are anarchists), I am much more of a republican (a "whig") and you're an absolute monarchist. I say absolute because I've examined the constitutional monarchism you advocate here, and I...

Do you agree with: "People with legal representation all other things being equal, are better off than people without an attorney." Idea is this one government service would right-size all the others. In time. I'm assuming you agree that we are a nation of laws. Is it equitable if there are...

Big time. He's gotten way worse recently though, wonder what causes that? I mean years ago he wasn't this acutely paranoid. Wonder what causes that? Wonder what causes that?

Your link appears to report that insurers are postulating the cause of higher non-covid death rates than expected is due to postponing medical treatment, why did you post this link?

Sounds like you could have used a lawyer. https://theologyonline.com/threads/universal-legal-representation.59212/

" 5. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION Review of the available data for this cumulative PM experience, confirms a favorable benefit: risk balance for BNT162b2. "

Pigs, womanizers, philanderers.

That's what I'm getting at. He kissed reality bye-bye long ago. Inured.

Sigh.

Ffreeloader wishes he were as big a moron as Putin is, but he's not in Putin's league of stupidity. Nazism was bad, but it was bad in large part because it was an autocracy. You know, like Russia and China.

So you're circling back to a "mostly peaceful" invasion then. Just so we're all clear on where you stand.

https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/dataviz/dfa/distribute/chart/

18th century France. Gross. I mean ... hooray!

Federal expenditure is like five trillion USD, that's 40 years of spending? And that's all with zero revenue to offset it? To come up with the 200 trillion USD figure? "That's [200 trillion USD] money Congress has spent"-you Oh I forgot to include public property. That was just household...

Yeah I'm beginning to come around to your way of thinking here.

So you now will admit it's a real live belligerent invasion then? :unsure:

Our national net worth is ca. 150 trillion USD last time I checked.

All I'm saying is that we accept that it is the case. If you don't accept it, in this sense, then you don't accept reality.

Well I know that. I'm talking about thinking that the contrary is a bad idea. Like there's nothing wrong with preferring chocolate ice cream to vanilla, but there's nothing wrong with preferring vanilla to chocolate either, but that's not an analogy to chastity and unchastity. I'm asking if...