Search results

Called it!

Bump

An excellent breakdown video of all the footage and facts (at least as of the time of posting it) from a YouTuber who works in law enforcement and the military (some minor foul language near the end): If you're a Pepperbox member, I recommend watching there, because there's about 7 extra...

Fair. But I was more pointing out the details of the Shroud of Turin, which was mentioned in the Tucker clip.

Prediction: @annabenedetti will ignore every photo and camera angle that I have just posted showing how the shoot was justified, and continue to peddle the narrative she is pushing. No one cares what you people think anymore, Anna, because you're irrational baboons repeating the narrative...

This thread just came across my X feed: https://x.com/i/status/2009972050853523878 |

Maybe try listening to what he's saying, rather than listening to anyone and everyone whose only concern is attacking his character because they hate him.

Whatever kind of camera it was, it disproves the narrative you're peddling. The cell phone he was holding in his left hand while he shot with his right as she drove into him, pushing him back several feet... Which completely justifies him shooting her. You don't have to imagine it...

The officer probably wasn't paying attention to her wheels. He was paying attention to the driver, who looked right at him as she tried to accelerate her two-ton weapon into him. That alone justifies the shoot. Too late. And she wasn't free to leave anyways. This is the moment she looks...

You're still giving interpretation. I'm not asking for your interpretation. I want the "why"s and "wherefore"s. The Bible needs little to no interpretation. Why are you trying to interpret it the way you are?

You've given your interpretation. I'm asking for your reasoning. If you can't understand the difference between the two, then the laughing emojis are completely warranted.

You're the one proposing a new theory. The onus is on you to explain why the traditional interpretation, that Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 are describing different aspects of the same one week of Creation. The Bible clearly shows the creation of the world from a macro view in chapter 1, then...

You seem to have missed the part where it contradicts what you said about the earth being "dry."

🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. The earth was without form, and void; and darkness was on the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Gen.1.1,Gen.1.2&version=NKJV The...

It's two tellings of different aspects of the same one week of creation. God created the heavens and the earth in six days and rested on the seventh. Then on Day 6, He created man. Simple as that.