Search results

That's right, that's a good 'pick up' there on your part. According to MAD (or they always now try to 're-brand' themselves not as a school of thought but only as an 'approach to reading the Bible', in a rhetorical attempt to establish their position as legitimized; even though it's just...

What are the potential outcomes here. Ukraine surrenders basically unconditionally. Ukraine refuses to surrender but Russia 'wins'. Ukraine successfully repels the invasion and Russia retreats. Ukraine successfully repels the invasion and most of the Russian forces are destroyed and the...

"Worried" and "angry" are your words. I know all that. You need to tie this together with ethics and morals to be on the topic.

I do. That's what this thread is all about. I'm diagnosing MAD. I'm the doctor not the patient.

Who's talking about worrying? Not me. That's your word.

Which photo?

I hope China doesn't have any ideas about Taiwan in light of Ukraine and of the American non-response.

My point exactly. MAD ethics is void.

There are at minimum four superfluous points, so I'll say Yes since you're demanding a yes-no.

'You serious right now?

Well, I'm making a fool out of something.

This is all you've got. Your data doesn't compare proportionality but absolute figures. It's like saying that China's wealthier than France because you're only comparing absolute GDP instead of GDP 'per capita'.

You can't. There's no real law for countries, there's only law inside of them. So if a regime does something evil like invade Ukraine and murder Ukrainians it's not like you arrest them and prosecute them in a court of law.

Just because every time you threw a deck of cards onto the floor the 52 cards didn't self assemble into a house, doesn't mean that it therefore never really did happen. That's a logical fallacy.

Yeah I won't be doing any of that. Would it be ethical and moral, according to MAD (Mid-Acts Dispensational) ethics and or morals, to tell Vladimir Putin to NOT murder 666 Ukrainians because he'll go to hell if he does so? I say it's ethical (according to my 'Protestant' understanding of...

Philosophically Mr. Peterson comes from materialism, he doesn't believe in God----so when he does think about God (the non-local hidden Person Who made everything) what does he think of? He thinks of ethics; morals. It's because being a materialist he 'gravitates' to the 'salient' things about...

The day to get a gun, learn how to use the gun, and start carrying the gun is not the day after Putin invades, it's before that day.

Missing the entire point. Par for the course with you. So predictable.

There is too: Life.

Aren't you presuming that "the rape victim" is actually a rape victim? Why don't you think that President Trump's accusers are "rape victims"? Why only President Biden's? What's the difference?