Search results

https://theweeklyworldview.com/the-deep-dark-state/ Links to the stories mentioned here that are not present in this post can be found at the link above. The Deep Dark State Posted on December 19, 2021 Join America’s most attractive audio engineer and her raving lunatic host as they cripple the...

By the way, this is ALSO in the aorist tense.

What about non-vaccinated, naturally immune people?

To each other, sure. When David said it back in the Psalms, it was completely and unambiguously about David not being left in hell, and honestly, given that it's poetry, I'm not even 100% sure that it's referring to Sheol except figuratively speaking. It DEFINITELY wasn't a prophecy (at...

There's no such thing as a "human understanding of logic." Logic IS. Period. It is, BY DEFINITION, objective. There's no such thing as "subjective objectivity." It's a contradiction in terms, an oxymoron. What method did you use to come to that conclusion? If it wasn't logic, then it, by...

Then you must acknowledge that If God infallibly knows T, therefore T must occur, according to the laws of logic: If God infallibly knows T, then logic dictates that you will do T, and not !T. Wrong. Necessity of the past dicates God infallibly knew T. Definition of "infallible" dictates...

Which my position has no problem with. "Death is separation," remember? Agreed. I don't see that anywhere in those two verses. In fact, I see the opposite: "God will not leave my soul in Hell." "Buried" and "sepulchre" both refer to the physical. Neither have anything to do with the soul...

The argument presented for [how God (infallibly) knowing the future means that the future is settled] was a purely logical one. Reminder: Arthur said this: He says these things because he believes God can do the irrational. God cannot do the irrational, nor is He irrational Himself. I...

Because they don't follow the laws of logic. Thus, by definition, they are irrational. Indirectly, Arthur did. And you agreed with him. Dimension? Not sure. It is definitely "above" our plane of existence, however. Your question answers itself.

Why assume such irrational things exist? God is described in the Bible as Reason/Logic itself... Something that is not possible if God is irrational!

Is God infallible? Does that infallibility apply to His attributes? If so, then, by the laws of logic, there is no choice BUT to answer the phone at that exact time. Saying it doesn't make it so, Arty. That's exactly the point, Arty. God infallibly knows something will happen, therefore it...

You seem to be forgetting that throughout Jesus' ministry, He would take questions about the physical world, and turn them into spiritual lessons. Why can't that passage that W2G brought up simply be that a man was saying he wanted to go bury his dead father's body, but Jesus turned it into a...

Ffree, Nothing in the post I quoted was about this threads topic. If you have a point to make that DOES tie in the two, then you need to make that point. Otherwise, the discussion you were having with RD was getting off topic, and it should be taken to a different/new thread. So make the point...

You're forgetting the "infallibly knowing" part. "Infallible" (in this context) means "incabable of being wrong." Thus, by you "infallibly knowing" that someone will answer the phone, they will, without fail (because if they don't, it would make your knowledge wrong, and thus, fallible) answer...

The problem you face is how long God originally intended for man to exist. Would you agree or disagree that God designed man in such a way that man would exist in some form or another for eternity? Here's a similar example, but it makes our point better than it makes yours: And so it was, as...

Also Calling Jesus a liar isn't going to end well for you.

Nope. Sorry. Not gonna let you derail the thread. If you want to talk about what happened while Christ was in the grave, then go to the other thread, where I have already stated my position and defended it.

Still not the Mark of the Beast.

This is off topic for this thread. Could you start a new one if you wish to continue discussing this?

There's a thread discussing exactly that that you should check out. Don't derail this thread.