Search results

Abraham lived around 2200 BC. The Flood occurred around 3290 BC (±100 years). You're telling me Shem lived about 1000 years? Not even close.

Child abuse.

How about Child Abuse?

It's actually old, about 7500 years (give or take 100 years) old! 4000 years ago is around the time of Abraham, not the flood.

Take it from someone who's not you: No, it's not what you're doing. Maybe what you know to be true is actually wrong. Considered that yet? Then your knowledge is in error, because he was, in fact, the first human. So what? DNA evidence points to Mitochondrial Eve (likely Eve herself), and...

That's what I've been doing. The difference is mine isn't an opinion. It's fact. Thank you for conceding the discussion. No. Humans aren't capable of fully turning from sin, not in this life. We still have to deal with our flesh, which is constantly pulling us away from Christ. Add to...

I can see you aren't going to bother to lift a finger to just tell me what it is that you support in any level of detail. You'd rather hide behind a bill that likely has nothing to do with what it actually implies. It's literally just about that easy.

Yes, He did. Yes, but it wasn't fiction that He inspired. It was a record of the literal history of the universe, because aside from Adam, who was only present on the last day of the universe's (including everything within it) creation, and the angels (who were there from around day 2, but...

Hate to say it, BB, but don't give the left any ideas... People are too dumb and might actually believe it.

So you don't even know what it's about and can't easily tell me, despite being an avid supporter of it? Or you do know and because my prediction was accurate, despite me having never read it, you would rather be petty about it and tell me to read it instead of telling me yourself, despite you...

I'm talking about for EITHER President. For ANY president. For ANY leader of a nation. That tends to happen when a republican candidate has to deal with the previous president's democratic initiatives, especially when he had been in office for the last 8 years.... Were you trying to say...

4-8 years isn't nearly enough time to fix America. Oh great, a bunch of socialist programs...

Did you mean to say here "When science fails...."? We're asking you to consider the evidence for the Bible. We also discuss facts and evidence. Opinions are a dime a dozen. Rather, your claims are the result of looking at secular dogma. In other words, it's not science. Speak for...

Nope. It is, in fact, direct evidence of a flood. Because it is. And those "works and studies" are wrong, because they assume millions of years, rather than starting with the evidence and following it wherever it leads. False. You're the one making the claim, therefore the onus is on you...

I'm talking about when the Flood occurred, which would have laid down MOST of the sedimentary rock we see today that evolutionists claim was laid down by millions of years. THAT was ~5300 years ago, NOT 3500 years ago.

False.

Yes, I'm sure. No, it doesn't. Nope. That's simply a very poor translation of what the verse says. Here's what it actually says: and swore by Him who lives forever and ever, who created heaven and the things that are in it, the earth and the things that are in it, and the sea and the...

3500 years ago is around the time of Moses. Definitely wasn't a flood at that point in time. It matters. Don't let blueboy trick you into conceding the argument by using his standards instead of the Bible's.

Care to write something that ACTUALLY makes sense? Time doesn't have a beginning. The verse doesn't say "before time began." It says "before the world began." Huge difference. Nope, sorry. None of these passages say what you want them to say.

5300 years, not 3500 years. The flood occurred around 3290 BC (give or take 100 years).