Search results

No, you're not. Then you should have addressed that when you first came here. Neither is you making the same straw man against ancient Israel. You regurgitating the same claim as if that settles the matter isn't helping you or anyone. Hey, leave bread out of this! Please quote anyone...

Don't forget to confiscate the money too! Because it can be used for crime too! Especially by the government... Oh wait...

How is that any different than what I said in my post? Why? Is not two or three witnesses, as God requires, enough to convict? In other words, are you calling God a liar? I'M ALL FOR THAT! Not needed. One fallible human is enough, better even, than multiple. Of course, if he wants to...

Redirection. Stay focused. Genesis 4:22 "Two or three witnesses" is not a rigid parameter, Arthur. How many times do we have to tell you that until we beat it through your thick skull? No, it wouldn't, as explained previously. Judges alone are the only ones who have the right to appeal a...

And you're the sole determiner of that? What was that about one witness not being sufficient to establish a matter again? Oh, right! “One witness shall not rise against a man concerning any iniquity or any sin that he commits; by the mouth of two or three witnesses the matter shall be...

Your loss. Because it allows me to thoroughly dismantle bad arguments such as yours. Good for you. It was so obvious, I'm not sure how you got to the point where you denied that the ancients had evidence, testimony, reason, and logic. Typical Arty. Doubles down when he's shown to be...

Excellent point!

You stated and then asked: To which I responded: You then said: So what context am I not recognizing when I challenged you on your answer, which was a denial that they had evidence, testimony, reason, and logic, by saying: How are you not trolling or just plain stupid? I can read just...

... is only using his brain, of which you have half, and using logic and reason to eliminate non-possiblities, based on the evidence. Saying it doesn't make it so. Only to you, because you have no argument, and don't want to let reason persuade you of the truth. He's not wasting anyone's...

They didn't have evidence, witnesses, logic, and reason? Now I KNOW you're trolling. Or just plain stupid, I can't tell which. So "eyewitnesses" and "circumstantial evidence" don't qualify as evidence or witnesses? Got it. And they didn't have logic or reason? Got it. You apparently think...

The same thing we have today. Evidence. Testimony. Logic. Reason. You still seem to be arguing something other than what we're talking about. You say "two or three witnesses" is not good because we have more reliable way of discovering evidence. I'm not seeing the correlation. Having more...

Again, how would the woman have gotten justice if "witness" meant "eyewitness", if "two or three witnesses" was required? How does that mean that "two or three witnesses" is not a good standard for today? As Stripe has pointed out multiple times already: Genesis 4:22. Do you think that one...

So what? https://kgov.com/crisis-pregnancy-centers https://kgov.com/bel/20020717

No one has changed the meaning, Arthur. You simply refuse to acknowledge that it means more than "eyewitness." https://kgov.com/two-or-three-eyewitnesses-not-needed-for-an-execution Else, how in the world do you expect the woman in my second scenario to ever expect her rapist to be brought to...

Anything that can be used for righteous purposes can also be misused. I don't deny that. Saying it's a horrible idea simply because it might be misused isn't a very strong argument, RD, I know you can do better than that! I've never claimed that DNA is "the perfect witness." but it is certainly...

We agree. Give an example. What about when "absolute, indisputable evidence" is not obtainable? Can a conviction still be made without it? CONSIDER: A woman is taking a stroll through a forest alone. A man assaults her, rapes her, and then leaves her for dead. She never got a clear look at...

Your standard is too high, and would result in too many criminals being set free, because all they need to do is provide enough evidence that brings other evidence that they committed a crime into question. God does not require "absolute, indisputable evidence." His standard across the board...

Killing people who should not die and keeping alive people who should not live both are profane to God. And will you profane Me among My people for handfuls of barley and for pieces of bread, killing people who should not die, and keeping people alive who should not live, by your lying to My...

An excellent point! One I'm sure Renegade has either forgotten or never considered.

This will be my reply to this tweet and any following tweets in this thread: It's not "my" way. It's God's way. He is the one who said: “Whoever sheds man’s blood, By man his blood shall be shed; For in the image of God He made man. - Genesis 9:6...