Search results

I used to use the indefinite article: "a Ukraine". But the style guides learned me against such usage, so now, for the sake of euphony, I say "an Ukraine". Which, if you shift the accent, happens to sound like "a nuke rain".

Ya know, it's not PC to call Ukraine, "the Ukraine": In the English-speaking world during most of the 20th century, Ukraine (whether independent or not) was referred to as "the Ukraine".[24] This is because the word ukraina means "borderland"[25] so the definite article would be natural in the...

You mean, for instance, like how conservatives are clearly happy and content having grifter-POTATUS Joseph Robbingus Blinden occupying/disgracing the White House and never want to see him leave? Isn't that "the way things are": Biden occupies the White House? Are they not conservatives whom...

Man of the cloth.

That doesn't even make any sense. Go first at what??

I never asked if you are a sinner, you sinner. I already knew you are a sinner. To what are you referring?

Whom will you pay for all your transgressions? How do you imagine you will do so? When do you imagine you will be done paying for all your transgressions? And, if you imagine you can pay for all your transgressions, then why have you not yet paid for all your transgressions?

But no Trinitarian has said that Jesus was/is the Father, and no Trinitarian has said that the Father is/has been incarnate. So, what "point" are you trying to make? If, by your word, "God," you are referring to the Father, then your phrase, "the incarnation of [the Father]" is nonsensical; it...

I doubt the self-righteous, Christ-hating heretic, @blueboy, would even admit the truth that he is a sinner with sins to be paid for.

The council of Nicaea is in 325 AD you Christ-hating pagan.

"Making sense" inside your own head again, are you? You sure are addicted to churning out loads of gobbledygook. It's sad that you are apparently deranged or drug-addled enough to be able to imagine that rationally-thinking people should, or even could, take your God-despising ravings seriously...

I don't know that time constraint is what inhibits you. Duh. 🔘 You are banned from TOL. ⚪ Click to un-ban yourself from TOL.

A couple years ago, I found a nice, 400th anniversary AV 1611 KJB facsimile reprint at a second-hand store. Great condition, and ridiculously cheap. I was thrilled! What a treasure! (Not so great as a conveniently portable pocket Bible, though.)

What's the difference, idiot? You've never even begun to try to deal with anything that I have written to you, anyway. And now, you've chosen to run with the "take a hike" part of the "answer the questions I have asked you, or take a hike"-ultimatum I gave you, since even you know full well...

So far, you've not answered a single question that I've asked you, you vicious, Christ-despising, Bible-despising liar. Answer the questions I've asked you, or take a hike, you deranged, Satan-worshiping, Russellite hypocrite. You know that you have no argument(s), whatsoever, to present on...

Try to wake up out of your sleep, child of the night, and of darkness. You've brought up Revelation 3:12. Well, what about it? How, exactly, do you imagine that verse is going to prop up your Christ-despising heresy? It's never going to. But let's hear it: What do you claim is being...

Why does he first need to do something in order for you to be able to give him a yes or no to the question he asked you? Are you in favor of political censorship? Yes or No?

Yes, we do. For instance, Luke 1:19 is such a verse: Since an elephant is something that does not speak, this verse, by telling us that an angel is something that speaks, tells us that an an angel is not an elephant.

EliG said: So, I asked him: EliG: <NO ANSWER> Why do you refuse to answer this question, EliG?

John teaches that Jesus taught that He is equal to God. According to John, Jesus signified that He is equal with God by 1) having broken the sabbath, and by 2) saying that God is His Father: That's what John says. That's not John reporting what the Jews said or thought. In that verse, John...