Search results

How about no. I actually don't like this truck. Give me a Kenworth any day. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Not sure what you're saying here.... could you clarify? Wrong yet again. Distance from the center of the earth to the surface of the oceans/seas is sea level. "A horizontal plane (the ocean surface) or line with respect to the distance above or below a given point (the center of the earth)."...

It's my truck, not Dave's lol. It's an International Navistar (or Prostar+) Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Wrong. While it does run (in relation to sea level ONLY) 'downhill,' from an elevation of 450m to 0m above sea level, it does actually go uphill, in relation to the entire earth. I give the reason why below. Notice how they only say "above sea level"? Well, here's the shocker: Dave, sea level...

The Mississippi Flows uphill. It's source is closer to the center of the earth than it's mouth. The only way it flows uphill is from centrifugal force. http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/209805/rivers-that-flow-uphill-due-to-earths-rotation Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline...

NOPE. We [I]just[/] showed you how water can and does run uphill. All movement of an object is in contrast to another object that can appear to be stationary. There is no absolute way to figure out if something is not moving at all, as any measurements you would take of such an object would be...

Dave, we've been through this. I'm not going to reply to it again. Actually I will, but this will be the last time. I want you, Dave, to take out a digital camera (your phone camera will work, if you have a phone with a camera, even better if you can manually control the amount of light that is...

Never said it was... I'm just asking a simple general question... But it doesn't seem that you know the answer, because your worldview (no pun intended) can't or doesn't explain planets or stars. So by that logic, you should doubt every photographer/videographer in the world, because you...

Yup. You clearly don't know what capillary action is. I suggest you look it up before you make a fool of yourself. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Also, are stars made of the same things as planets? Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Dave, would you say that most advancements in science have been from atheists/pagans? Or would you say that the advancements have been from Christians? Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

The idea of "gravity" did not come from someone who believed in materialistic origins. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Interestingly enough, if each of the cars ran into each other, both at 30 miles per hour, then both vehicles would experience the same amount of force as if just one of those vehicles hit a solid brick wall. Mythbusters even did an episode about that. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline...

If I remember correctly, I think he said something like how dense somthing is... Wait a minute, that sounds a bit like... no, that can't be... It sounds like gravity. (See my single sentence explanation of what gravity is in my above post.) Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

That would only be true if there was no such thing as gravity or mass. No, Dave, the only thing that is a contradiction is your perception of gravity. You think that if there is gravity, then there is not movement of anything. Yet you completely forget that gravity is, in scientific terms, a...

"disk earth?" Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

https://www.reddit.com/r/space/comments/5t5ql8/as_if_the_milky_way_in_this_photo_wasnt_enough/ Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Can an oblate spheroid look anything like a sphere? Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

What proof do you have that it was faked? Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Insulting me is not helping your argument, Dave. You're not paying attention to the wording I used. "Photo" is not "video." I never said that blue- and green-screening didn't exist, I said that "photoshop" and video don't go together. PLEASE PAY ATTENTION. Now, please answer all the questions...