Search results

That's called moving the goalposts, Dave. No one made the argument that they're infallible. It's not hard to check someone's work to make sure the results they give are accurate. More moving the goalposts. :AMR:

You don't even know what stellar parallax is, do you? Do you know what the word "parallax" means? Because the way you just used it is probably one of the stupidest comments I've seen you make yet, and there have been a lot of them.

No, Dave, it doesn't. This is where stellar parallax comes into play. Again, YES IT CAN. It just takes time and effort to do. But you're not willing to take the time or put in the effort, are you?

Dave, this is you failing to comprehend the scale of the universe again. The North star is 433.8 LIGHT YEARS away. That's 2.55 × 10^15 miles. Or if you prefer longhand... 2,550,000,000,000,000 miles away. 12,427,423,844 miles is hardly a stone's throw away. Add to that the fact that Polaris is...

No Dave, it wasn't. I've been paying attention to this thread almost since the beginning of the original thread, and you have NEVER addressed the size of Australia.

No, he didn't. Or at least, he never did address it. Whether or not he had the opportunity to, I can't say.

Eh, "not impossible" and "possible" have slightly different connotations.

This is why you're mentally ill.

If everything is moving at the same speed, then what Clete said here should be wrong. Go out and do what he says, and if he's right, then your premise, that everything is moving at the same speed, is wrong. It's simple observation. Yet I predict that you will refuse to do it.

Good point.

"Proof by repeated assertion" fallacy. There is noticable difference in the speed of objects in the sky, Dave. Do what Clete said, and you'll see it for yourself.

Plus 20k more in the original thread. No idea how many others on other threads.

You're right. We're sick of you avoiding the arguments we make, only to post more videos about unrelated topics to the current discussion. Saying it doesn't make it so. Not sure where you got that idea, but it was Eratosthenes who measured the circumference of the earth... You can't measure...

Stupid doesn't make you sin. Sin makes you stupid.

They're not moving at the same velocity, Dave.

It's very possible Dave. Once again, you show that you are incapable of understanding just HOW BIG the universe is. You constantly fail to comprehend the scale of the distances.

Curved horizon, non-fish-eye lens. Credit: NASA

What irks me is that the entire time we've used 3000 miles for the flat earth model, NOT ONCE have you said that it was incorrect or unreliable. Why now? Why all of a sudden do you imply that "3000 miles" is not the typical number used for the flat earth model...

Then how far away is it, Dave? That's something YOU need to provide. How far away, how big, and many other questions which YOU REFUSE TO ANSWER! Clete just showed you ABSOLUTE PROOF that the earth couldn't be flat, and you COMPLETELY IGNORED IT!!!

A photo from NASA's "image of the day". Soaring into Sunrise https://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/iotd.html