Search results

Typical Arthur Brain. Talking about everything BUT the topic of the thread and reverting to ad hominem because he can't win an argument. Try addressing the topic, once you come back from your ban: It's a Biblical principle. It's applicable in all situations. Even before the Fall, Adam had...

That's ironic, especially coming from the person who hardly ever provides any evidence of his own. I think I'll pass this time.

Indeed it is. How about you? Do you support such a system?

Of course there are. Of course. Yet it's better, if she has children, to have a husband to provide for her and her children, so that she can focus on the children and give them the best possible chance at succeeding in life.

Of course. Yet it's better, if she has children, for her to have a husband to provide for her and her children. Loser: a person who fails frequently or is generally unsuccessful in life A woman, with a child/children, who does not have a husband, or a man, with a child/children, who does not...

Which has nothing to do with right or wrong. Sorry, but most organizations, once they have become corrupt, rarely come back from being so. Even less often if governed by majority rule, because the majority is wicked. Too bad. It's the truth. So what? When did God ever give permission to...

You mean taking back the money that I've been forced to give the government over the past several years? Sure. https://kgov.com/bel/20161206 And yes, I still oppose such a system.

Because the evidence says so.

The fact remains, it is, objectively speaking, better for the woman with a child/children to be supported by a man, rather than trying to do all the work herself. A fact, that children who have lack either their father and mother present throughout their childhood are statistically more likely...

No, it's better, objectively, because the man can provide for her and her children, while she takes care of her children. Why is that so hard for you to understand?

It's a Biblical principle. It's applicable in all situations. Even before the Fall, Adam had to work to maintain the garden. After it, God told him that it would be by the sweat of his brow that he would provide for himself and his family. Hunger is THE strongest motivator for people to...

You're certainly welcome to your opinions, but don't be putting words in my mouth. Nope. Normal police, normal military. Eider: Which, if any, sin is NOT evil? Correct. You are a deist. Most Christians who have a proper Biblical worldview are capitalists. God, for all things belong...

When such a system by default is taking money from others to give it to other people who are not deserving of such, it is, by definition, theft. Because you say so? Because Paul said if a man does not work, he shall not eat. There's a huge difference between not being able to work, and not...

That's all they have, opinions. They don't have facts anymore.

As RD just said: A woman with a child/children is better off being married, so that the husband can provide for her, as she provides for her children, so that her children have the best odds of not being utter losers when they grow up.

If the CDC listened to anyone, they wouldn't have given the advice they've given. Little ol' me won't change them, unfortunately. Why are you giving bad advice?

Jesus taught people to forgive those who repent, not to forgive without the person repenting.

No, because the facts show what I said to be true.

Oh, it's not my idea. It's God's idea. He's the one who instituted marriage and all it's rules, after all.

The fact that masks do not protect the user or people around the user from viruses has not changed, despite what the CDC says/has said. Lockdowns don't work. Masks don't work. Shutting down an entire economy kills people. Social distancing is inadequate. Proper quarantine procedures and...