Search results

Once again you utterly failed to not only grasp basic physics and mathematics, but you completely ignored what he said. I STRONGLY recommend you read his post again. Also, I gave a number of 75 feet above sea level, not 6 feet. The reason for that is that you DID NOT give a camera height for...

They would not be visible......... FROM SEA LEVEL! As I stated above, your photos WERE NOT TAKEN AT SEA LEVEL, and you DID NOT give the height of the camera, nor any indication of where the photo was taken. You're using a false equivalence fallacy to justify your position, and everyone in this...

Oh, and don't forget, we're not even taking into consideration refraction of the atmosphere yet. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

At sea level? That would be about 600 feet. But sea-level is not where your photo was taken. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

No kidding. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Fine, let's be generous (because I can't be certain from the photo) and assume that h0 = 75 ft. That means there's a 250 ft drop off from where one's line of site meets the horizon to the object, which on a 300 ft tall object, leaves 50 feet above the horizon. Sent from my Pixel XL using...

Correction for what I said above: "h0 = 0 feet" is sea-level. I'm talking about the photo you provided. The viewpoint looks to be higher than h0 = 0, and seems to be at least h0 = 60 feet, if not more. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

What is the person's eye height above sea level? Where sea level is h0, eye level is h-what? Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Not enough information to answer the question. Need to know what height one's eye would be. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Just lights in the sky? Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Just answer the question. Are they dots? Points of light? Or actual celestial bodies? Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Weight is a product of gravity. Try again. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Answer this question, please, Dave. Do stars exist as just dots in your flat earth dome? Or are they actual celestial bodies, like the standard definition for stars? Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

So then what's holding everything to the ground? According to you, gravity doesn't exist. Also, I didn't say that your flat earth was moving. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

So what's the difference between things moving through the atmosphere on a flat earth verses things moving through the atmosphere that rotates with a round earth? To the bird flying through either, the earth and air are stationary, relative to the bird, which flies through the atmosphere like...

I'm talking about your view of a globular earth. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

You keep saying "a rotating earth will cut through the atmosphere." Explain please, and then answer my question from my previous post. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

See, that's where you're having trouble. You assume that, if I'm reading your comments right, the atmosphere is stationary, and possibly extends infinitely (correct me if that's not what you're saying). However, the atmosphere (note, "-sphere"; you used it too) is gravitationally bound by...

Especially since I'm sure he uses GPS... Or would that be DPS, "Disk Positioning System"? Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

That you have very little grasp on reality. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app