Search results

He's mocking you, in case you weren't aware. Dave, What is the model the flat earthers use for Noah's Flood? Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Dave, what is the flat earth's theory for the Noachian Flood? Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Dave, the "top" and "bottom" of the earth are considered to be the north and south poles, because there's a north star and a southern cross. And while your analogy in general is acceptable, "top" and "bottom" have very little, if anything, to do with "uphill" and "downhill." Dave, on the...

YES THERE IS, DAVE! Yes there is! There are mountains and hills and valleys and canyons. You're arguments are getting more and more insane with each of your posts! Dave, there is no way for that to be true on either a flat or a round earth. "It contradicts because I, Dave, am too stupid to...

Einstein and Darwin both died rejecting God. NASA is just a program, and I'm pretty sure quite a few of the people who work there are Christians, especially some of the astronauts. And Copernicus would probably take offense (as I do) at you blaspheming the name of God. Copernicus was a...

This is exactly what I was doing. Downhill from one frame of reference (sea level in general), uphill from another (sea level at the poles (if the earth was a perfect sphere). Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Again, rebutted in the video. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Your exact response is rebutted in that video. You should watch it before replying further. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Someone didn't watch the video (not picture). Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

The "contradiction" you are talking about is not a contradiction because uphill and downhill are relative terms. The Mississippi River is flowing "downhill" relative to sea-level (in general). However, relative to a specific "level" (sea level at the north and south pole), it is flowing...

Dave, There's a small amount of discussion on a Globe earth on yesterday's BEL show. http://kgov.com/bel/20170214 You may want to listen. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

So what about the fact that the sea level at the equator is 21.36km farther from the center of the earth than sea level at the poles? Am I mistaken about that? And what about the physics stack exchange link I provided? Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

I realize now what I forgot to add to the second image. The bottom line of the lower triangle represents the distance from the center of the earth to the surface "height" of the poles. The left vertical line represents the height difference of the above to the height of sea level, which is...

Don't forget the Mississippi River! (See my posts above) Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

http://kgov.com/node/5067 Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

By the way, Dave, the circle I drew? It's not a perfect circle. Its slightly flattened Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

*facepalm* I'll respond to you in a bit. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

My truck was parked on a hill, with the nose pointing towards the sky. The parking lot dips towards the back. The only reason the horizon rises up to "eye level" is because I'm in a small valley. The terrain is nowhere near flat. Completely irrelevant, as I'm in a valley and the terrain is not...

You're not comprehending what I'm saying. I'm saying that while, relative to "sea level", the river is indeed flowing downhill, but relative to the center of the earth (the earth's core), the river is flowing uphill, as the equator is "higher" (read "farther away from the center of the earth")...

How about no. I actually don't like this truck. Give me a Kenworth any day. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app