Search results

Not if one is naked. Lol Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

The naked truth is that the flat earth model is flat out wrong. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

In addition to the argument that Knight is making, I also need to point out another discrepancy between reality and the flat earth model. At any given time during the day, about half of the earth has sun visible, and the other half cannot see the sun. This can be explained perfectly by a globe...

Dave, do you believe in absolute truth? Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Duh, Dave. No one is saying that it's not a circle from our perspective. What Knight is saying is that the "circle" of the "orbit" of the sun is perpendicular than to what the flat earth model shows. This means that there is only one point (not all points) during the day that the sun would be...

I think you need to read this post again, then. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

I'd say if anything, Sir Knight is biased towards the truth, which is the only acceptable bias. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Dave, What does the flat earth model have to say about the many references to God "stretching out the heavens" in the Bible? Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Clete asked that of him a while back. Dave basically said that there isn't anything. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Have you seen Pastor Enyarts "The Planets, Stars, and the Bible" video? Facinating. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

:think: :idea: Do you think that that might be because it's physically impossible to create a flat earth map based on real world calculations? :noway: :stuck: :idunno: Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Sure, everyone agrees that the current maps are not perfect. That does NOT mean, however that they aren't pretty darn close to accurate. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Dave, conceding a point to your opponent doesn't mean the debate is over, it just means you're intellectually honest. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

"cameras for consumers" Right, because a consumer grade camera is going to perform the same as a multimillion dollar piece of finely tuned equipment. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

I think you should stay out of my personal life, thank you very much. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Actually, I don't think you understand what I'm getting at. Can you even consider the possibility that you could be wrong? Could you comprehend that? Think for a moment about that and what it entails, how what you've taught is damaging to society. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline...

https://youtu.be/Txvw-2buFTI Dave, I just came across this video. Perhaps you can explain the details in it. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Or, perhaps they're actually using it for what they say they're using the money for. Again, it comes back to a conspiracy that is impossible to maintain. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

If we're going to focus on what ifs, let's talk about the "what if Dave is wrong about everything he's talking about" question. Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app

Again, I make the point of which group would have the equipment to take the photos. You? (it is your Nikon, right?) Or an organization with a huge budget that can afford the equipment that can take such long distance photos at high resolution? Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app