Search results

και θεος ην ο λογος και ο λογος σαρξ εγενετο κεκληται το ονομα αυτου ο λογος του θεου It's as plain as day. Why do you deny scripture?

Define "die" Define "death" Define "died" Define "dies"

Yes, it was a straw man. No one here is "trying to weasel out of Jesus' humanity and death in order to prove that Jesus is the one true God." Obfuscation. @Hilltrot Please define "died." If that means simply copying and pasting the definition provided by a dictionary, then so be it. If it...

Because you say so? We agree that Jesus did, in fact, become human, and is, to this very day, human. We agree that Jesus, did, in fact, die. And to go further, we agree that He rose from the dead on the third day, and then about 40 days later, returned to heaven to sit next to His Father...

Do you have anything to say about the OP, or only about me?

But it does say that Jesus is God. You're just covering your eyes because you don't want to see it in the Bible. Let me ask you this: What if you're wrong? What if, despite all the arguments you've brought to this discussion, you find out after you die that Jesus really is God? Versus, what...

You're nitpicking. I'm glad you recognize that. Most of my opponents over the years won't even go that far in discussions of any topic. False. You seem to have missed the rest of my post. Here it is again: I'm also not aware of any place in John's Gospel (the passage in question...

No, but the Bible's declaring that Jesus is God does.

And he would have more time to spend on other things if he didn't waste his time on threads he doesn't deem worth the effort. You will always have time for things you deem important, generally speaking.

If you think they're a waste of time and energy, then why do you post in these threads?

If you think there's a problem, why not show what the problem is?

The only inconsistency arises when you define words the wrong way. Define "died." False. Because you say so?

Define "died."

Still waiting on this: Then would you be willing to amend this statement, as it is inaccurate at best, dishonest at worst?

Nope.

Chair, I can kind of understand addressing the second half of ffreeloader's above sentence with the link you posted, but I don't see how it resolves the first half. And to be honest, it doesn't quite resolve the second half either, as there are other ways to be involved with a company than to...

https://theweeklyworldview.com/robbing-the-end-of-the-world/ Links to the stories mentioned here that are not present in this post can be found at the link above. Robbing the End of the World Posted on January 31, 2021 Join America’s most attractive audio and her host for tales of Alchemy...

Question begging. Why do you think that Jesus Himself could not have been speaking in third person about Himself? You'd have to ask the person who decided to put these verses into red. Unfortunately, he died in 1910. So that may be a bit difficult. I will point out that "Son of Man" was a...

What evidence do you have that Jesus is not speaking throughout the passage?

Then would you be willing to amend this statement, as it is inaccurate at best, dishonest at worst? I'm not sure about it being a miracle drug (and I generally oppose using the term "miracle" to describe anything that is not, in fact, a miracle, but it has been shown to be effective at...