Search results

All of those cultures arrived AFTER the flood. They couldn't have been drowned in a flood if they didn't even exist when it occurred.

Currently, they are not perfect. Which is why I made the clarification of "original manuscripts." If they changed, they wouldn't be original, now would they? How is that a counter to my points?

Again: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_flood_myths

And? So what? The difference is that the entire surface of the earth was destroyed in the Noachian Flood. And? Your point is? Meaning? He didn't just drop them, he threw them onto the ground and broke them. More fairy tale. The reason Moses broke the tablets was that he was angry with...

I said flood OR cataclysmic event. You know what a cataclysm is, right? Have you ever played the game called "chinese whispers" or "telephone"? Now imagine it being played, not by children, but by generations of tribes of people, where one generation passes on a story to the next. Over time...

You need to read more carefully. Nowhere did I mention Covid or the Covid vaccines in any of my posts. I stated that any vaccine that uses or is developed using dead babies should be considered immoral:

Well, yes, they are, and the video does just that. Think he's wrong? PROVE IT! I dare you. My yardstick is if something is repeatable, verifiable. You know, like actual science. Last I checked, anyone can buy a vape stick and a mask and do the exact same test. You still have not answered...

The not-a-gospel you preach is nonsense. And it certainly is not THE gospel of Christ.

Because you say so?

Of course they are! The problem is that unlike every other nation that rewrites their history, which shows them to be the "good guys" and attempts to glorify themselves and show how great they are, the history of the nation of Israel recorded in the Bible is NOT one of glorification, it doesn't...

Yes it is, and I showed you where. You DO need to make an actual argument. So far, all you've done is posturing and claims that the Bible is wrong. :nono: You have it backwards. The events in Genesis 1-6 came before the Mesopotamians even existed. They got their stories from the division...

Thank you for explaining. However, Noah sinned because of his already extant sinful nature. Creation had already fallen from perfection. There was no going back to it, not yet at least. No pretending here. Generic claims like this presented without evidence can be dismissed without...

Please format your post appropriately. The way you're formatting your post makes it hard to understand who is saying what. Here's a link to help you with that: https://theologyonline.com/help/bb-codes/ If you need further assistance with formatting your posts, please contact me, and I will do...

There was more to my post than the kgov interview with Dr. Clem Persaud. Try reading past the first line of a post sometime. Go back and read it again.

Because they clearly and repeatably demonstrate the opposite of what said entities are claiming. Nope. Of course not. However, when it is demonstrable that the opposite of what such entities claim is true and verifiable, there is reason to doubt said entities. You seem fascinated with...

No. This is fun, isn't it? Nope. Never claimed to be. What I HAVE claimed is the ability to see with my eyes and think with my brain, and to reason. Something "Arthur Brain" apparently can't do. Again, non-sequitur.

K. Why did you bother posting in this thread again if you aren't going to consider the evidence?

https://kgov.com/bel/20201002 https://cogforlife.org/wp-content/uploads/CovidCompareMoralImmoral.pdf https://cogforlife.org/2020/06/04/sanofi-pasteur-discontinues-aborted-fetal-polio-vaccine-using-moral-cell-lines-instead/

My point remains. Dead babies were used in the development of some of the vaccines.

Well, no, I'm not. You clearly don't know what an appeal to authority is. Allow me to define it for you, from Wikipedia: An argument from authority, also called an appeal to authority, or argumentum ad verecundiam, is a form of argument in which the opinion of an authority on a topic is used...