Search results

I mean exactly what I said. Who is to be held responsible for harming someone with a vaccine (or any form of medicine, for that matter) that is supposed to protect them? Because currently, the companies producing the covid vaccine, as far as I'm aware, are not liable for damages caused by their...

You also didn't answer my question: So no one should be held responsible for damages caused by taking a vaccine, but someone who does NOT take a vaccine they find to be questionable, or tainted morally, should be punished?

If we were talking about a highly contagious viral pandemic, then sure, things would be different. But we're not. The covid is not "highly contagious," at least not as highly contagious as more serious, and far more deadly, diseases. No, you don't. No, we don't. No, I would be better off...

From the link: "The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is a no-fault alternative to the traditional legal system for resolving vaccine injury petitions." So no one should be held responsible for damages caused by taking a vaccine, but someone who does NOT take a vaccine they find to...

Neither you nor I have any obligation to care about what anyone else does regarding their own personal health. To reiterate: My neighbor has the right to choose to be afraid. If he is afraid that I unknowingly carry an illness, he has the right to be afraid of me. He has the right to stay...

Haven't taken the jab. Haven't been destroyed yet. What if the opposite happens? Where they take the jab, and it destroys them? Who should be held resposible?

Lets put all the homo and pedo perverts in the military on that ship, and then have one or more of our battleships open fire on it and cause it to sink into the ocean.

That's nice. Now make a rebuttal. Appeal to the stone is a logical fallacy. Make the argument, or concede that you have none. By the way, simply responding to this post (and any future posts you respond to) is you changing. False. You, in responding to my post, changed from not having...

Yes. Showing mercy is, itself, a change, from initially not showing mercy upon someone who deserves punishment, to not punishing them. The fact that God is merciful doesn't change, but God DOES change by showing mercy. To restate the premise here: That God does not change... in his...

Marke was the one who stated it originally, but I'm starting to wonder if Lon believes it too...

@Omniskeptical fix your formatting.

For example? Such as? Which was because you can't differentiate between right and wrong, as you so clearly demonstrated, which is what he was responding to. His statement that you should not be a pastor had nothing to do with open theism, and had everything to do with you not being able to...

Jesus: I came forth from the Father and have come into the world. Again, I leave the world and go to the Father.” - John 16:28 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John16:28&version=NKJV Lon: "er, no..." Who's right? You'll have to explain how you arrived at that conclusion, because...

Beam, eye, remove it, hypocrite.

Do I smell a Battle Royale XV brewing? I volunteer as a referee! Aw.... That's a lot of tea...

You missed an "Eve" pun there... "... EVEr heard of him?" XD

Scripture. God created man from the dust of the ground and breathed life into him. The only man that came from God was the Man, Jesus Christ. EDIT: As for the second half of that phrase, you'll have to define what you mean by "sustained," since as far as I can tell, "sustained" is something...

Is not a term Paul used, but one that only Jesus and Peter used, both of whom were speaking DIRECTLY to the nation of Israel. There is currently no such thing today (nor for the past 1800 years or so) as a "born again believer," despite the fact that the church has misappropriated the term to...

Because Paul says otherwise. And we know that Paul, at the very least, did not contradict himself. No, just addressed to a different audience than the other books in the New Testament. No, let's NOT assume that, because that's called begging the question. It's a logical fallacy for a reason...

Did you choose to write such stupidity, or did God predestine you to do so? Which answer makes more sense in light of 1 Corinthians 14:33?