Search results

What marke said aside, much of the water is still on the earth, while the rest of it was ejected into space. Why? If the mechanism that drove the fountains of the great deep was gravity pulling on a supercritical fluid that was forced out of (relatively narrow) cracks in the crust, and then...

The Bible gives a clear indication that half of the water was above the crust that was spread out, and the other half was below it: Then God said, “Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.”Thus God made the firmament, and divided the...

Is fermenting foods a sin?

You seem to think that it is possible to break the rules while not facing the consequences.

This thread is about the Biblical flood, and therefore belongs in this forum.

And from the subtitle of the GFHPT forum: "This section is for discussion specific to the Biblical Global Flood and Dr. Walt Brown's Hydroplate Theory."

The Creation Science Forum, and regarding the Flood, the Global Flood and the Hydroplate Theory forum

You seem to have misunderstood something: 1M1S was not banned from the CS forum. He was banned from the thread he was in. He still has access to the CS forum. The problem was that he was trying to derail the thread. That is NOT allowed. Had he kept to the thread topic, he could have remained...

It's for debates. Not casual discussion. And the thread is about the Global Flood, which we have a forum for. Please post threads in the appropriate forums.

The continents colliding.

Idolater, The Coliseum is not for general discussion. It is for Battle Royal threads and related. If you continue posting in there, you will be getting an infraction.

Yes, and it's different for every person. Some people have a high tolerance for alcohol, some get wasted on a single sip. The prohibition in the Bible is on people losing control of their faculties. Again, the entire thread is there for everyone to see that this is simply false. So what?

Drunkenness is what's wrong. Drinking is not.

No, Marke, it DOESN'T! AND THIS ENTIRE THREAD SO FAR exists as evidence of that! What it DOES "discourage if not condemn altogether" is drunkenness, NOT DRINKING! Which is completely fine, but doesn't prove your position.

Of course it means something. But it doesn't mean what you say it means. :yawn: Edit: Correction on my part: wine-bibbing, as GD mentioned on the next page, is being drunk. I have. You've ignored me. Let me repeat myself: DRUNKENNESS is what's wrong. Not drinking.

Which is just you copping out, because you cannot deny that Scripture clearly does not forbid the drinking of alcohol. You should humble yourself, and learn to admit when you're wrong, when you have been shown to be so.

Good for him. Your anecdotal data point doesn't change the fact that the Bible does not forbid the drinking of alcohol.

No, he's not saying that at all. Ripping the verse out of its context has led you to believe that drinking alcohol should be forbidden. But it's not talking about forbidding alcohol. It's not even directed at Christians! It's directed at the following people: Who has woe? Who has sorrow...

No, because there's no prohibition against drinking wine in Proverbs 23:31.

The answer is this: "he explained to them that there was no such thing, because as soon as grapes are crushed, the juice begins to ferment into wine."