Search results

First of all, if you're going to respond to someone, please use the "+QUOTE" or "Reply" button at the bottom of the post you wish to respond to. Second of all, why are you addressing this to me? None of this addresses anything I said, which wasn't much at all.

Link to the full playlist: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLipp11LQP_zFPWbodNqsE6wnNdx66Q6nE

God IS sovereign. But he's not sovereign how a Calvinist defines the word, which isn't the actual definition anyways. They use the same word, but give it a different meaning.

INDEED! AMEN! Sure. No, Lon, it simply does not. Infinite ( adj. ): 1. limitless or endless in space, extent, or size; impossible to measure or calculate. - very great in amount or degree - [mathematics] greater than any assignable quantity or countable number. - [mathematics] (of a...

Now you're starting to get it.... I think... Again, I believe 2 Timothy 3:16-17. The entire Bible is profitable for men of God. It doesn't mean that there isn't truth relevant to both Jews and the members of the Body of Christ, let alone deeper truth. It means that some things were said in...

How in the world did you arrive at that conclusion!? Of course I don't believe that, nor is it what I said! I believe 2 Timothy 3:16-17. And again, you fail to rightly divide the word of truth.

It doesn't. You fail to rightly divide. It's not telling US (members of the Body of Christ) "faith without works is dead." You're reading someone else's mail, thinking it's addressed to you. It's telling a future generation of Israel "faith without works is dead." Not the Body of Christ...

No, He does not. False. Wrong. "No works" means no works. Period. "By grace through faith." If someone is on their death-bed, and places his trust in Christ, and then dies immediately after, your position would mean he went to hell because He had no works after He was justified...

https://chatgpt.com/share/67905e69-a1a0-8001-9b32-R23D32251847 There is one verse, ONE that says God's UNDERSTANDING is infinite. But that does not necessitate that God Himself is infinite. I stand by what I said above. The Bible does not call God "infinite."

@ok doser help is on the way!

You just did.

Should it not? Does not your theology drive everything in your life? IOW: Ideas have consequences. People act how they believe. Consider Steve Lawson. His theology drives his life. He believes that God foreordained everything that comes to pass, and there is a reason for everything He...

Thank you. So? Did you understand the point that was being made? Can you articulate it? I wasn't talking about the "conjecture" claim, which isn't an appeal to incredulity anyways. It wasn't even conjecture, either, not that there's anything wrong with conjecture! I was an "if - then"...

The haunted houses would be crazy! :P

Ugh, the lack of photos around the site (especially on Google Maps)... I would love to visit one day and take a few photospheres of the place for Maps. Okay, found some on Google earth. This is the view of Golgotha within the Garden Tomb area...

To give you an idea of just how close the Garden Tomb is to Golgotha, unfortunately I can't seem to find any good context shots on Google Maps, but I'm pretty sure you can see Golgotha from within the garden. And even if not, it's only a few minutes' walk between the two locations. Edit: it is...

Dunno. Just know that they had to prepare Jesus' body quickly, thus eliminating most burial sites (that aren't close enough to any places of punishment) and of the ones that remain, Golgotha and the GT are the only two sites that are close enough to each other and that match the narrative...

So what? ---- Instead of complaining about how unwatchable it is, you could, in good faith, watch it and address what was said. Appeal to incredulity is a logical fallacy. Are you talking about the video? Or Isaiah 41? You still aren't seeing it. Blinded by your own paradigm. If God...

Also, since it seems you didn't catch it: He is rebutting a fellow Open Theist. Not really an "opponent," per se. Most of your post seems to just be nit-picking, rather than considering what he actually said.

So many? So few? You a word. He recently publicly debated Dr. James White (and on the topic of omniscience, no less), and won. I'd say that gives him some clout. You cannot explain it without it being philosophical nonsense, because it is, inherently, such.