Search results

This, again, is idiotically false. There's far to many ducks for such an effort to be successful but, theoretically speaking, if we wanted to intervene, ducks could be selectively bred away from their aggressive mating tactics. Also, what ducks are doing IS NOT RAPE!!!

The way animals treat each other doesn't have anything whatsoever to do with natural law! Natural law is based on careful examination of HUMAN nature! It works because we, unlike the animals, have been created in the image and likeness of God. It is precisely natural law that tells us that...

It is absolutely NOT true in any correct sense of the word "rape". Rape NEVER has anything to do with reproduction and rarely ever results in a preganancy. It is a violent act intended to physically control, emotionally humiliate and otherwise psychologically injure the victim. All things that...

That makes sense. Public funding for private schools is a contradiction. I do not support turning private schools into public schools. Often when free societies are new, it takes a while for the market to catch up with demand. Mann's movement was an indication that the demand was present and...

While I don't necessarily disagree with any of that, I'm pretty certain that is not an old post of mine. Public education is a bad idea because it's premise is theft and because the government is incapable of performing 1/10th as well as the private sector as providing the public with an...

What time of day is it? Is that what you asked? Find out for yourself.

Listen you guys, Hoping is NOT a Christian. He is delusional beyond any help, beyond any convincing, beyond any reason whatsoever. He pretends not to commit any sin by the power of the Holy Spirit and yet doesn't understand the basic plot of the New Testament. He's a liar and a fool. You waste...

There is no fixing it because the Constitution failed to translate the right to life into the right to private property. As a result, we have neither. A good start, however, would be to get the government out of the business of providing ANY good or service that can be provided by the private...

Your objections, it seems to me would all be overcome by simply adding a mechanism by which the king could be impeached, thus placing him under the law, which is what I've been advocating. Your faith in our constitution is understandable but misplaced. We are already living under laws that are...

You act like Nang. Congratulations.

Well, you ought to. Repeating yourself doesn't do a thing to respond to what I've already said in response to this, glorydaz! You sound like a broken record.

Really?! I was just listening to a recording of his where he talked about it and called it a "new argument". I thought I was listened to something relatively recent but it must have been an older one. Regardless, its certainly not an old argument.

A point that, if true, would mean that God is not omniscient! At least not in the Classical sense of the term.

You're making yourself look ridiculous. You should look up the term "Question begging".

Its frequency of use is directly proportional to the frequency of unsubstantiated claims being made in this forum. That's a laugh since the contingent being argument was made first by Bob Enyart only months before his death (i.e. several months ago). It's one of the most eloquent arguments...

Brilliant post! The part about Ariel making herself into a contingent being will go over her head. She won't understand what you're talking about at all.

The same is true of the system you are proposing so this doesn't move the debate along at all. It isn't a committee and even if it were, the guarantee is the same as anything in the system that you propose, the rule of law. Millions? I'm simply talking about a referendum of some sort among...

I've added nothing. "Adding" is your accusation which you have failed to establish. Pretending like it's true doesn't count as an argument. For reasons explained multiple times already in response to this exact endlessly repeated statement. Repeating the same accusation over and over and over...

That's the stupidest thing ever. Romans is one of his letters. What there's no support for is thinking that chapters 9-11 don't go with the rest of the book of Romans. So what? He said it exactly two sentences after you claim he just made a distinction! Did he change the subject inside the...

For the seven hundredth time, I've NEVER DENIED IT!!!! Who am I even talking too here? The entire freaking thread is right here for the whole dad-gum world to read, glorydaz! So says Paul.. Romans 10: 10 For with the heart one believes unto righteousness, and with the mouth confession is...