Search results

It's easy to take unexamined capricious contrariness personally. Not my fault.

Agreed! Just for the record, I meant no disrespect to the actual Mr. Staples in offering his own quote from his own Wikipedia article. I myself am extremely "nasty" and "foul-mouthed" at times, so I would only be disrespecting myself to suggest or imply that it somehow detracts from someone's...

Coz I ever claimed to have it? I never did that. Didn't do that. My memory's not faulty in this matter. Maybe in others, sure, but not here. I know what I saw, because it's the only reason I even thought to mention what I did. I did nothing wrong or even incorrect or inaccurate. It's...

See below. Spin. There's a more charitable way to describe my posts in this thread, and you've opted not to go that route. For some reason. For some contrary reason.

lol so you are the all knowing user here who knows what every single user ever posted ever and you can positively rule out that what I'm saying happened happened. Any ideas why you must be so contrary all the time?

Except one. Where he did. I didn't dream it up.

It existed, if it does not presently exist. It's the only reason I'm even mentioning it. I didn't dream it up.

And on one of those articles, this particular 'sock' account did claim to be its author, and the author was Mr. Staples. I'll attempt to find it.

Well, I don't know: maybe. But this is a quote from Mr. Staples' Wikipedia page today, purporting to be in his own words: " In spite of the jousting, we became good friends. But when it came to religion, Christian charity would often go out the window." So whatever is meant by "jousting" and...

I settle for a lack of irresponsibility. I don't need responsible behavior, I just need not irresponsible behavior.

I don't think this is 'doxxing' because if it is really him, he himself made the claim; one of his previous 'sock' accounts claimed to be Mr. Tim Staples, who is enough of a celebrity (very minor) that he's got a Wikipedia article. I'm in no way affiliated with Mr. Staples or any of these...

That's good news.

Nobody needed to help Putin be Putin. Putin did that all on his own.

Everybody's invited to WWIII if it ever happens.

Then you don't agree. " .. if you don't already know it is a sin" has nothing to do with whether it is a sin. Did Mr. Peterson claim to be a prophet in the OP?

How exactly do you propose to do that without starting WWIII? I mean, they've got us all over a barrel right now. They can lay waste to the whole country and murder every last soul, and we still can't do anything militarily.

It was the Romans who crowned Him.

The rest of the parable of the fig tree is in Acts 1-8?

No all sins are objectively knowable, it has nothing to do with intent or volition whether or not something's a sin. Sins are objective, not subjective. Mr. Peterson never said he is a prophet, not to my knowledge.

All the time, like you.