Search results

Ok. You had your chance to answer the question.

Yeah, because investors aren't interested in profits. So you still haven't given us the real answer why investors don't want to invest in oil production when profits are high. LOL. Sure man. Even by your standards it doesn't stand, that it's the oil companies and not investors. You're free to...

Investors realize that either the government will pull the rug out from under their investment, or the government has placed restrictions on production that increase costs so there is no opportunity to make profits even if oil is high. Your turn. What is the answer? "Still plenty of drilling...

Then the question is no longer why oil producers will not pump oil, but why are investors not taking advantage of a great opportunity. Let us know what you find. And, BTW, it means you are still wrong.

Independent producers develop 91 percent of the wells in the United States – producing 83 percent of America’s oil and 90 percent of America’s natural gas.

You are wrong here. Most oil companies do not have a substantial cash reserves. And by most oil companies I mean the relatively small independent companies that produce about 80% of the oil in the US.

Because the tectonic plates had neither buckled nor run into each other. That's the two cases that make the high mountains.

Since Ted is pro-abortion with exceptions, in not sure you've thought this through.

I was rejoicing in the truth. Because you are more consistently wrong than Jefferson it was less flamboyant rejoicing than it appears you wanted.

Well that didn't take long. You think Ted Cruz would improve things? See where this "support the lesser of two evils" has gotten you?

Sadly, user name is correct. Jefferson was incorrect on that point.

That certainly wouldn't be Trump.

From the article: "Either Republican voters will succeed in fundamentally changing the Republican Party so that it aligns with and represents their interests, or they will demolish that party and bury its remains deep in the desert." Neither will happen. The party will limp along with its...

LOL. That guy is unreasonably optimistic! He can't be that blind, can he? I mean, he's a smart guy, isn't he? "The result is an unmitigated disaster that not only has tarred the Democratic Party, corrupted once-revered agencies, and alienated half the country from our cultural institutions"...

The problem is, Trump didn't recognize the good he was doing. What I mean is the good he did wasn't because of good principles Trump made decisions by. This is why he got worse, and very bad, at the end. People on the right recognized and predicted this even before he was nominated. So the...

No, there doesn't have to be extra water in the way you are thinking. Understand that the world was flatter before the flood. And the water washed over the earth for about a year, constantly, more than the earth "sat" in water. And after the flood the world's crust had been 'roughed up a bit'...

"She was one of the most popular Governors because she stood up to corruption in both State Government and the Fake News Media." All she stood up to was a few progressive branches she thought pruning off would make things better. She never went after the root and never understood that pruning...

I don't think the infrastructure is that big a problem. We have a way to do it that is economically feasible, so we just need the political will. And there will be a political will when it becomes apparent enough for the masses to see it.

They are not rare. They are ignored by geologists (like they ignore human footprints in what they say is old rock) so I guess that makes them rare to you. But they are so plentiful that laymen that make a serious effort have found them every time they look for them. And they ignore carbon-14 in...

Unfortunately, you would then get in a situation where the leaders would look at the cattle and decide it would be easier to nuke parts they don't have a need for at the moment.