Search results

Your lying and glaring self-contradiction throughout this thread is a rooting-out of you, poser.

I view your self-contradiction as a self-contradiction. And what you are doing, now, is lying about your self-contradiction, and trying to distract attention from it by uttering nonsense like "I see as two different subjects". You clearly are highly devoted to your father Satan.

But you did not say "by appearances" before; rather, you said they fall away: So now, once again shooting yourself in your foot, you've just changed your story from saying they do "fall away" to saying they do not "fall away".

So, by telling us you are capable of "falling away" tomorrow, you are telling us you are a poser, and that you are not now, and have never been, "in Christ Jesus".

According to you, if you're "in Christ" now, you are incapable of sinning tomorrow. So, by admitting to us you are capable of sinning tomorrow, you are admitting to us that you think you are not "in Christ" now; you are admitting to us that you think you are a child of the devil. You've shot...

You are not right in the head. I've documented you in the act of glaringly contradicting yourself, and not only have you just noted your agreement with the fact of your self-contradiction, but you sit there actually doubling down in that very self-contradiction, as though you consider...

VS How can they "fall away" if, as you say, they have "none occasion of stumbling"? You've not thought this stuff through. But, out the other side of your self-defeating mouth, you say they fall away: But, according to you, they fall away:

So, @Hoping, basically, your doctrine is "Once walking in God, always walking in God" (OWIGAWIG). Yet, out of the other side of your mouth, you contradict it by telling us that you are presently "walking in God", but that you don't know that you will still be doing so years from now: If (as...

Yeah. And? What you are doing is serving your father Satan by flatly contradicting what Paul wrote. Paul wrote: "For we ARE saved by hope", whereas you are asserting that Paul was NEVER saved, and is STILL NOT saved. Paul wrote: "For we ARE saved by HOPE", whereas you are asserting that...

I do not believed you are saved, you sinner. You're a Christ-hating child/servant of your father Satan. False. Paul was already saved long ago, while he still walked the earth, 2,000 years ago. Besides, out of the other side of your mouth, you keep telling us that a person's salvation...

By each of those phrases, either someone is referring to the Bible, or he/she is not referring to the Bible. By "Scripture", Christians are referring to the Bible. To what would/ought someone be referring to by the phrase, "The Canon of Scripture", if not to the Bible? Anything called "The...

I don't know about you, @Jefferson, but I often wonder about the face images we see of "Biden" in photos like these recent ones, as compared with those we see in photos like the one you posted above. I mean, I know that we have to take a decade+ of aging into consideration, but nevertheless, I...

All the talk about apes in the Darwinism thread made me think of this video: Unfortunately, The Onion has some pretty foul stuff, but they do have a few things that really crack me up.

True. Because Darwinists have no arguments, no rational thinking to present on behalf of their stupidity, they really do prefer to imagine that everyone just has to be as stupid as they are and will never notice. Since he has been banned from TOL, @Barbarian the lying Darwin cheerleader has...

@InDarwin'sWatch, by "ape-like ancestors", which do you mean: humans or non-humans? Which of the following, two things are you saying? "humans evolved from [humans]"? "humans evolved from [non-humans]"? By "evolved from", do you mean were born to? Is this what you're saying: "humans [were...

What Darwin cheerleaders call "evolution", and "the theory of evolution", is not fact, and it is not theory. It's gobbledygook, cognitively meaningless. Not only is it not true, but it does not even rise to the level of being false.

Why your quotation marks? Whose words are you quoting?

By asserting your heretical falsehood that names have been erased from the book of life, you are admitting they have already been found in the book of life. So, you are thereby admitting that those have already been saved whose names you falsely assert to have been erased from the book of life...

Paul said that he and his some of his contempory addressees were already saved in the first century A.D.: For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God. (1 Corinthians 1:18) He divides people into two groups: "us which are...