Search results

It's funny how none of what you wrote in that post even resembles a response to anything I wrote in the post to which you replied.

Paul says we are justified by faith, so our faith actually can, nay, does justify. Must our faith be in our faith?

Different Greek words are behind these instances of "by"—different from the Greek behind the "by" in Romans 5:1. I should note that I have a handy, easy-to-use New Testament Greek resource standing by by which I was enabled to find that out by simply consulting it.

Romans 5:1 Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ The word "and" or "plus" or "in addition to" or "alongside" or "in conjunction with" is not in Romans 5:1. Wouldn't you agree, then, that in Romans 5:1, at least, Paul is only teaching that...

Wasn't sure where best to post this. I know it's not exactly a Creation Science topic, per se, but from the link it may be apparent why I chose to put it here, anyway. Throughout my adult life I've been kind of a jazz snob, yet I did "grow up" with a lot of rock music (and still can't help...

I saw him/her use that odd term once or twice: Made me kind of wonder where he/she got it from.

:ROFLMAO: That's not what the write ups say!

@Sepent1 seems to even include the Byzantine texts as "Greek translating" that "was translated out of Catholicism translating": Which makes you wonder what @Serpent1 would even use for a New Testament.

Too late. You already said they did, here: And here:

LOL You Catholics always say that sort of thing. Similarly, you were saying Catholicism gave us the Bible:

What do you even mean by that? Here's what I had written: Do you mean that what I meant is: ? It's very clear that I did not judge myself to not be a Christian, inasmuch as my words "my fellow Christians" show me judging myself to be a Christian.

You’re not even a Christian, so you're not one of my fellow Christians, you illiterate hypocrite.

Yeah, because, originally it was called "Codex Sinaiticus", and he thought that would be too hard for knotheads to be able to read, let alone type out on a keyboard. Hence, today we have the "codex sinacticus".

In other words, @Servant1 cannot be taught.

Why can't you even write a sentence? You're literally stating nothing, at all, in that post. You've got severe mental problems.

Sure it is. It's His name. It's one of His names. Your "point"? Wait... Which of those two words is His name: "YHVH" or "Jehovah"? (And, if one of them isn't His name, then why'd you write it?)

Six-digit salary, too!💰😎💰 Now behave, or I may draw on my plenary power and prerogative as moderator and put you on IGNORE!🤣

I've asked you at least twice, now: @Servant1: <STILL NO ANSWER> I've asked you at least twice, now: @Servant1: <STILL NO ANSWER> Why can't you answer these simple questions, you vicious, Christ-hating liar?

Your post was a reply to your own post. You literally just told yourself you have a thread and no clue. True and true.🤣

Oh, wait...I see you put no comma between "No" and "titles". You're merely voicing your agreement with me by an out-of-the-ordinary use of a double-negative. It is true indeed that no titles are not names/that all titles are names. Or, to put it in a way that will really resonate with you: "No...