Search results

What a stupid question. Because you want to stop Putin and protect the lives of Ukrainians. Don't you? Do you want to stop Putin and protect the lives of Ukrainians? Yes or No? How exactly do you "disagree with Trump"? Both you and Trump are not risking your lives fighting against Putin, so...

So, according to you, microorganisms can't live unless something has previously died? So much for the Retardwinist stupidity of imagining some microorganism as an "universal common ancestor"; you can't even get your self-defeating fairytale of the origin of life started. Retardwinism requires...

@Avajs: <NO ANSWER, STILL>

@Avajs: <NO ANSWER> I like how you try, but fail to hide the glaring fact that even you know you can't respond rationally to that question, by calling that question "incoherence".

Neville Chamberlain, your fellow Brit? Why are you taking the Putin position v the Ukraine? But that's what you're showing you agree with: that Putin should wind up with part of the Ukraine. Do you expect that your empty, hypocritical, TDS-leftard talking will mean Putin will leave without...

Yeah you are. Why aren't you over in the Ukraine risking your life fighting Putin, hypocrite? You're giving the Ukraine to Russia, you puppet of Putin. No more than you are, talker.

Why are you giving the Ukraine to Putin, talker?

Solomon Graundy __________, born on a Maundy Thursday... Anyone? I need a word that rhymes with "Thursday" for this completely brand-new nursery rhyme I'm working on.

I won't watch that video until you first tell me what (if anything) is said in it that you imagine is somehow a "rebuttal" to something I wrote. But the cartoon character in the thumbnail reminds me a little of Brooks Hatlen in The Shawshank Redemption.

@1Mind1Spirit I asked you: You: <NO ANSWER> God, in Genesis 1:3, when He says "Let there be light," is by His word "light" either referring to a person, or not. Which is it? Is God, in Genesis 1:3, when He says "Let there be light," by His word "light", referring to a person? Yes or No...

I'm not sure that was the Holy Spirit. I think you might have warped to Level 6-1.

Welcome, Manuel; meet manual! It's all downhill from here!

Well, hopefully you know I don't mean to hurt your feelings, and I suspect you're just being sarcastic in saying that. You tend to get a tad annoying when it comes to much of your discourse on the topic of what you call "Catholicism", and I've no doubt I do the same to you. But these are huge...

He never said His body; a human body isn't even something that is/can be said. Words are things people can say, whereas human bodies are not. Also, the Bible does not even record Him as having ever said the phrase "His body" in any of His recorded, face-to-face, in-person, in-the-flesh...

Exactly what did He say to do, when He said "Do this in remembrance of me"? Did He say to eat something? Did He say to eat bread? If so, broken bread or unbroken bread? I ask because you have said that, whereas your "priest" eats broken bread, he administers to you to eat only "broken" bread --...

In what literature? In The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes? I know what's meant by it. Your use of "IFF" where you used it is superfluous, because you are wrong in your "only if". No, He clearly did not say that, and you know it. What He said was "And when he had given thanks, he brake it, and...

So, according to you, this "priest's" breaking of something you claim is Jesus's body rather than the bread that it is symbolically represents breaking of bread. Your "priest's" breaking of "his own host" is him symbolically "breaking" the "host" he hands you? What? So now, you've just told us...

It makes perfect sense, and would make perfect sense either way, so you can keep your superfluous F. It's your grade. Again, what He said: "...this is my body..." What He did not say: "...bread is my body..." What He did not say: "...this bread is my body..." What He did not say: "...this...

Which (if any) thing(s) that you wrote in it do you believe are true?