Search results

Yeah. And? What you are doing is serving your father Satan by flatly contradicting what Paul wrote. Paul wrote: "For we ARE saved by hope", whereas you are asserting that Paul was NEVER saved, and is STILL NOT saved. Paul wrote: "For we ARE saved by HOPE", whereas you are asserting that...

I do not believed you are saved, you sinner. You're a Christ-hating child/servant of your father Satan. False. Paul was already saved long ago, while he still walked the earth, 2,000 years ago. Besides, out of the other side of your mouth, you keep telling us that a person's salvation...

By each of those phrases, either someone is referring to the Bible, or he/she is not referring to the Bible. By "Scripture", Christians are referring to the Bible. To what would/ought someone be referring to by the phrase, "The Canon of Scripture", if not to the Bible? Anything called "The...

I don't know about you, @Jefferson, but I often wonder about the face images we see of "Biden" in photos like these recent ones, as compared with those we see in photos like the one you posted above. I mean, I know that we have to take a decade+ of aging into consideration, but nevertheless, I...

All the talk about apes in the Darwinism thread made me think of this video: Unfortunately, The Onion has some pretty foul stuff, but they do have a few things that really crack me up.

True. Because Darwinists have no arguments, no rational thinking to present on behalf of their stupidity, they really do prefer to imagine that everyone just has to be as stupid as they are and will never notice. Since he has been banned from TOL, @Barbarian the lying Darwin cheerleader has...

@InDarwin'sWatch, by "ape-like ancestors", which do you mean: humans or non-humans? Which of the following, two things are you saying? "humans evolved from [humans]"? "humans evolved from [non-humans]"? By "evolved from", do you mean were born to? Is this what you're saying: "humans [were...

What Darwin cheerleaders call "evolution", and "the theory of evolution", is not fact, and it is not theory. It's gobbledygook, cognitively meaningless. Not only is it not true, but it does not even rise to the level of being false.

Why your quotation marks? Whose words are you quoting?

By asserting your heretical falsehood that names have been erased from the book of life, you are admitting they have already been found in the book of life. So, you are thereby admitting that those have already been saved whose names you falsely assert to have been erased from the book of life...

Paul said that he and his some of his contempory addressees were already saved in the first century A.D.: For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God. (1 Corinthians 1:18) He divides people into two groups: "us which are...

Where exactly do you imagine you found that in the Bible, you Christ-hating sinner?

There, yet again, you demonstrate the fact that you are a sinner, @Hoping. Every time you say that you are not a sinner, you thereby show that you are a sinner, a lying servant of your father Satan. And your reaction to this post will be you sinning yet again, you sinner.

@Hoping: <NO ANSWER> @Hoping: <NO ANSWER>

Here, you've just admitted the truth that you do not believe God, you God-hating sinner.

Does God sometimes misstep, too? Does God sometimes misjudge things, too? By admitting your imperfection, you are contradicting the glaring falsehood you have previously told us: viz., that you are "as perfect as God is perfect":

You've shown yourself to be a Christ-hating promulgator of anti-Bible heresy; you don't follow God. So, you have no point.

What's your "point"?

Which means they were following God. So, what's your "point"?